Microbial consortia for pesticide biodegradation: mechanisms, cross-class pathways, and translational challenges

The use of synthetic pesticides estimated at 4.1 million metric tons annually worldwide, has led to widespread contamination of soils and aquatic environments, with documented risks to ecosystem integrity and human health. Physicochemical remediation methods are costly and often generate secondary pollutants and toxic intermediates, making microbial bioremediation a lower-residue alternative to physicochemical treatment. Because pesticide degradation in natural environments is rarely achieved by single microbial species, this review critically synthesizes evidence on multi-species microbial consortia-natural, synthetic, and genetically engineered for the biodegradation of six major pesticide classes: organophosphates, carbamates, pyrethroids, neonicotinoids, organochlorines, and triazines. Integration of the ecological mechanisms underlying consortium synergism (sequential metabolic cooperation, metabolic division of labour, biosurfactant-mediated bioavailability enhancement, horizontal gene transfer, and extracellular enzyme cooperation) with the enzymatic and genetic basis of degradation for each pesticide class, and evaluate how emerging tools like multi-omics profiling, CRISPR-based strain engineering, immobilisation technologies, synthetic consortium design, and AI-assisted optimisation are reshaping consortium design. Reported removal efficiencies are consistently higher for consortia than for monocultures across the studies reviewed here, though direct comparisons vary by pesticide class and experimental design. The review closes by evaluating the principal barriers to field-scale translation, strain persistence, ecological risk and regulatory approval, and monitoring of introduced strains and proposes a tiered framework for matching consortium design to contamination scenario. To date, this is the review to integrate ecological interaction mechanisms, class-specific enzymatic pathways, and translational technologies for pesticide-degrading consortia within a single framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biodegradation
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-026-10368-w
Primary Topic
Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microbial consortia for pesticide biodegradation: mechanisms, cross-class pathways, and translational challenges

M. Petchimuthu, M Karthikeyan, Arunprakash Soodamani, K. Murugavel et al.
Biodegradation
Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
article

Microbial consortia for pesticide biodegradation: mechanisms, cross-class pathways, and translational challenges

M. Petchimuthu, M Karthikeyan, Arunprakash Soodamani, K. Murugavel, Johnson Iruthayasamy, Elango Lavanya, Suganthi Angappan
article en

Abstract

The use of synthetic pesticides estimated at 4.1 million metric tons annually worldwide, has led to widespread contamination of soils and aquatic environments, with documented risks to ecosystem integrity and human health. Physicochemical remediation methods are costly and often generate secondary pollutants and toxic intermediates, making microbial bioremediation a lower-residue alternative to physicochemical treatment. Because pesticide degradation in natural environments is rarely achieved by single microbial species, this review critically synthesizes evidence on multi-species microbial consortia-natural, synthetic, and genetically engineered for the biodegradation of six major pesticide classes: organophosphates, carbamates, pyrethroids, neonicotinoids, organochlorines, and triazines. Integration of the ecological mechanisms underlying consortium synergism (sequential metabolic cooperation, metabolic division of labour, biosurfactant-mediated bioavailability enhancement, horizontal gene transfer, and extracellular enzyme cooperation) with the enzymatic and genetic basis of degradation for each pesticide class, and evaluate how emerging tools like multi-omics profiling, CRISPR-based strain engineering, immobilisation technologies, synthetic consortium design, and AI-assisted optimisation are reshaping consortium design. Reported removal efficiencies are consistently higher for consortia than for monocultures across the studies reviewed here, though direct comparisons vary by pesticide class and experimental design. The review closes by evaluating the principal barriers to field-scale translation, strain persistence, ecological risk and regulatory approval, and monitoring of introduced strains and proposes a tiered framework for matching consortium design to contamination scenario. To date, this is the review to integrate ecological interaction mechanisms, class-specific enzymatic pathways, and translational technologies for pesticide-degrading consortia within a single framework.

BiodegradationVol. 37(5)
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (IN), University of Southern Queensland (AU), Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Ghatkhed Amravati (IN), Tamil Nadu Horticulture University (IN)
University of Southern Queensland
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.