New development: Patronage police appointments in autocracies—lessons from Serbia

IMPACTThis article is particularly relevant for senior police leaders, public sector managers, oversight bodies, and international reform practitioners working in contexts of de-democratization and autocratization. It shows how patronage-based appointments of police leadership undermine professional policing by weakening operational independence, distorting internal incentives, and eroding public trust. Practitioners can use these findings to identify early warning signs of politicized appointment processes and to design safeguards that protect merit-based recruitment and leadership selection. The analysis highlights how patronage at the top of the police hierarchy signals to lower ranks that political loyalty outweighs professional standards, thereby reinforcing broader patterns of organizational politicization. More broadly, the article contributes to debates on police professionalism and public sector governance by showing how leadership appointment structures shape institutional autonomy and democratic policing outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Money & Management
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2026.2729401
Primary Topic
Policing Practices and Perceptions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New development: Patronage police appointments in autocracies—lessons from Serbia

Luka Glušac
Public Money & Management
Policing Practices and Perceptions
article

New development: Patronage police appointments in autocracies—lessons from Serbia

Luka Glušac
article en

Abstract

IMPACTThis article is particularly relevant for senior police leaders, public sector managers, oversight bodies, and international reform practitioners working in contexts of de-democratization and autocratization. It shows how patronage-based appointments of police leadership undermine professional policing by weakening operational independence, distorting internal incentives, and eroding public trust. Practitioners can use these findings to identify early warning signs of politicized appointment processes and to design safeguards that protect merit-based recruitment and leadership selection. The analysis highlights how patronage at the top of the police hierarchy signals to lower ranks that political loyalty outweighs professional standards, thereby reinforcing broader patterns of organizational politicization. More broadly, the article contributes to debates on police professionalism and public sector governance by showing how leadership appointment structures shape institutional autonomy and democratic policing outcomes.

Public Money & Management
University of Belgrade (RS)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Policing Practices and Perceptions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.