Longitudinal interplay of prosocial behavior and multiple interpersonal relationships among Chinese children in grades 3–6.

= 0.56; 62.2% boys). A random-intercept cross-lagged panel model revealed significant within-person dynamic interactions: a sustained reciprocal enhancement spiral between prosocial behavior and peer relationships (Wave 1-Wave 4) and an early positive feedback loop with family relationships (Wave 1-Wave 3). A critical socialization phase emerged at Grade 4 (Wave 2), when peer relationships positively predicted subsequent family relationships (β = 0.153), prosocial behavior (β = 0.141), and teacher-student relationships (β = 0.110). Family and school interpersonal relationships also facilitated each other. These findings delineate person-environment interactions in social development, extending developmental resource theories and proposing a multisystem interpersonal environment model to inform collaborative family-school interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Family Psychology
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001528
Primary Topic
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Longitudinal interplay of prosocial behavior and multiple interpersonal relationships among Chinese children in grades 3–6.

Ruibo Xie, Weijing Ding, Mingshu Chen, Wenhao Yang et al.
Journal of Family Psychology
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
article

Longitudinal interplay of prosocial behavior and multiple interpersonal relationships among Chinese children in grades 3–6.

Ruibo Xie, Weijing Ding, Mingshu Chen, Wenhao Yang, Yue Chen, Yu Zhang
article en

Abstract

= 0.56; 62.2% boys). A random-intercept cross-lagged panel model revealed significant within-person dynamic interactions: a sustained reciprocal enhancement spiral between prosocial behavior and peer relationships (Wave 1-Wave 4) and an early positive feedback loop with family relationships (Wave 1-Wave 3). A critical socialization phase emerged at Grade 4 (Wave 2), when peer relationships positively predicted subsequent family relationships (β = 0.153), prosocial behavior (β = 0.141), and teacher-student relationships (β = 0.110). Family and school interpersonal relationships also facilitated each other. These findings delineate person-environment interactions in social development, extending developmental resource theories and proposing a multisystem interpersonal environment model to inform collaborative family-school interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Journal of Family Psychology
Zhejiang Normal University (CN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Longitudinal interplay of prosocial behavior and multiple interpersonal relationships among Chinese children in grades 3–6. — Ruibo Xie, Weijing Ding, et al. · Journal of Family Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS