It doesn’t always have to be this way: promoting girls’ interest in STEM through growth mindsets and structural explanations of gender differences

Gender gaps in motivation for STEM fields emerge at an early age and generally persist as children become older. Viewing these gender differences in motivation as malleable rather than fixed or inherent may reduce stereotyping and promote girls’ motivation in STEM. The current paper reports findings from two preregistered experimental intervention studies. These interventions targeted girls’ beliefs about stability (Study 1) and external attributions for gender differences (Study 2). Study 1 ( N = 381) examined whether a growth mindset intervention could increase Grade 6 and 8 students’ motivation for computer science. There was some evidence that girls in the intervention condition reported higher motivation on some outcomes, and exploratory findings further confirmed the importance of girls’ motivational beliefs. Study 2 ( N = 220) examined whether teaching 11- and 12-year-old girls about external, structural explanations for gender differences could influence their interest in a novel STEM activity. Exploratory results showed that structural explanations dampened gender stereotypes and also promoted belief in the malleability of STEM interest; effects on girls’ motivation were not found. Beliefs that interest and abilities in STEM are malleable may be helpful but not sufficient to foster girls’ own motivation in STEM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Psychology of Education
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-026-10294-y
Primary Topic
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

It doesn’t always have to be this way: promoting girls’ interest in STEM through growth mindsets and structural explanations of gender differences

Kahyun Lee, Andrew N. Meltzoff, Sapna Cheryan, Allison Master et al.
Social Psychology of Education
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
article

It doesn’t always have to be this way: promoting girls’ interest in STEM through growth mindsets and structural explanations of gender differences

Kahyun Lee, Andrew N. Meltzoff, Sapna Cheryan, Allison Master, Daijiazi Tang, Shaila Sharmin
article en

Abstract

Gender gaps in motivation for STEM fields emerge at an early age and generally persist as children become older. Viewing these gender differences in motivation as malleable rather than fixed or inherent may reduce stereotyping and promote girls’ motivation in STEM. The current paper reports findings from two preregistered experimental intervention studies. These interventions targeted girls’ beliefs about stability (Study 1) and external attributions for gender differences (Study 2). Study 1 ( N = 381) examined whether a growth mindset intervention could increase Grade 6 and 8 students’ motivation for computer science. There was some evidence that girls in the intervention condition reported higher motivation on some outcomes, and exploratory findings further confirmed the importance of girls’ motivational beliefs. Study 2 ( N = 220) examined whether teaching 11- and 12-year-old girls about external, structural explanations for gender differences could influence their interest in a novel STEM activity. Exploratory results showed that structural explanations dampened gender stereotypes and also promoted belief in the malleability of STEM interest; effects on girls’ motivation were not found. Beliefs that interest and abilities in STEM are malleable may be helpful but not sufficient to foster girls’ own motivation in STEM.

Social Psychology of EducationVol. 29(1)
University of Washington (US), University of Michigan (US), University of Houston (US)
National Science Foundation, Institute of Education Sciences
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.