Machine Learning-Guided Scope Selection to Balance Performance and Substrate Similarity

Abstract The determination of a reaction substrate scope enables downstream users to assess whether a specific transformation is suitable for an intended application. The information content of this scope, characterized by its performance and structural diversity, is crucial to ensuring the quality of such decisions. Despite their importance, scopes have historically been evaluated subjectively, leading to well-documented selection biases that compromise the scope quality. Herein, we report a scope score to analyze scopes quantitatively within a specific chemical search space, enabling the benchmarking of common selection methods. Additionally, we developed a broadly applicable and user-friendly machine learning algorithm, ScopeBO, for selecting scopes that effectively balance substrate performance and diversity. The scope score is used to optimize the hyperparameters of ScopeBO and validate its performance across several reaction data sets. Using statistical tests, we found that ScopeBO outperforms all other selection methods considered. Consequently, ScopeBO provides an objective and standardized approach to scope selection that maximizes the information content of the evaluated substrates, addressing a long-standing challenge in reaction development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6c10981
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning-Guided Scope Selection to Balance Performance and Substrate Similarity

Sven Roediger, Matthew S. Sigman, Abigail G. Doyle
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

Machine Learning-Guided Scope Selection to Balance Performance and Substrate Similarity

Sven Roediger, Matthew S. Sigman, Abigail G. Doyle
article en

Abstract

Abstract The determination of a reaction substrate scope enables downstream users to assess whether a specific transformation is suitable for an intended application. The information content of this scope, characterized by its performance and structural diversity, is crucial to ensuring the quality of such decisions. Despite their importance, scopes have historically been evaluated subjectively, leading to well-documented selection biases that compromise the scope quality. Herein, we report a scope score to analyze scopes quantitatively within a specific chemical search space, enabling the benchmarking of common selection methods. Additionally, we developed a broadly applicable and user-friendly machine learning algorithm, ScopeBO, for selecting scopes that effectively balance substrate performance and diversity. The scope score is used to optimize the hyperparameters of ScopeBO and validate its performance across several reaction data sets. Using statistical tests, we found that ScopeBO outperforms all other selection methods considered. Consequently, ScopeBO provides an objective and standardized approach to scope selection that maximizes the information content of the evaluated substrates, addressing a long-standing challenge in reaction development.

Journal of the American Chemical Society
University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Utah (US)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure, Division of Chemistry
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.