mRNA-based seasonal influenza vaccines: an overview of immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety

Available seasonal influenza vaccines, most of which are still produced in eggs, have several limitations. Messenger RNA (mRNA) technology has emerged as a transformative approach capable of overcoming some of these shortcomings. This overview synthesizes clinical trials evaluating the immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety of standalone and combination mRNA influenza vaccines. Moderna’s mRNA-1010 (now approved in the United States) and Pfizer’s modified-nucleoside RNA candidate (modRNA) represent the most advanced standalone platforms, while Moderna’s combination influenza and COVID-19 vaccine, mRNA-1083, was recently granted European authorization. Following iterative platform optimization, these vaccines induce robust humoral and cell-mediated responses, especially against influenza A strains, characterized by extended germinal center reactions, continuous somatic hypermutation, enhanced Fc-mediated effector functions, and strong T helper 1 engagement. In phase III relative efficacy trials, an optimized mRNA-1010 formulation achieved superiority over standard-dose vaccines with a relative efficacy of 26.6% (95% CI: 16.7%, 35.4%) in adults aged ≥50 years. Pfizer’s first-generation quadrivalent modRNA candidate showed 34.5% (95% CI: 7.4%, 53.9%) relative efficacy against a standard-dose comparator in younger adults aged 18–64 years, but failed to demonstrate non-inferiority in older adults (≥65 years), showing a relative efficacy of −5.8% (95% CI: −47.2%, 23.8%). However, whether mRNA platforms offer incremental benefits over enhanced formulations (such as high-dose, adjuvanted, or recombinant vaccines), which are the preferred options in some countries for older adults, remains to be established. The safety profile aligns with licensed COVID-19 mRNA vaccines; although reactogenicity is higher than with conventional vaccines, adverse reactions are predominantly mild-to-moderate and transient. Operationally, transitioning to single-dose pre-filled syringes alongside expanding refrigerated stability data significantly mitigates historical cold-chain bottlenecks. However, while standalone and combination mRNA platforms represent a major technological advance, real-world implementation challenges may affect their broader global health impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Immunology
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1965512
Primary Topic
Influenza Virus Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

mRNA-based seasonal influenza vaccines: an overview of immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety

Alexander Domnich, Andrea Orsi
Frontiers in Immunology
Influenza Virus Research Studies
article

mRNA-based seasonal influenza vaccines: an overview of immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety

Alexander Domnich, Andrea Orsi
article en

Abstract

Available seasonal influenza vaccines, most of which are still produced in eggs, have several limitations. Messenger RNA (mRNA) technology has emerged as a transformative approach capable of overcoming some of these shortcomings. This overview synthesizes clinical trials evaluating the immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety of standalone and combination mRNA influenza vaccines. Moderna’s mRNA-1010 (now approved in the United States) and Pfizer’s modified-nucleoside RNA candidate (modRNA) represent the most advanced standalone platforms, while Moderna’s combination influenza and COVID-19 vaccine, mRNA-1083, was recently granted European authorization. Following iterative platform optimization, these vaccines induce robust humoral and cell-mediated responses, especially against influenza A strains, characterized by extended germinal center reactions, continuous somatic hypermutation, enhanced Fc-mediated effector functions, and strong T helper 1 engagement. In phase III relative efficacy trials, an optimized mRNA-1010 formulation achieved superiority over standard-dose vaccines with a relative efficacy of 26.6% (95% CI: 16.7%, 35.4%) in adults aged ≥50 years. Pfizer’s first-generation quadrivalent modRNA candidate showed 34.5% (95% CI: 7.4%, 53.9%) relative efficacy against a standard-dose comparator in younger adults aged 18–64 years, but failed to demonstrate non-inferiority in older adults (≥65 years), showing a relative efficacy of −5.8% (95% CI: −47.2%, 23.8%). However, whether mRNA platforms offer incremental benefits over enhanced formulations (such as high-dose, adjuvanted, or recombinant vaccines), which are the preferred options in some countries for older adults, remains to be established. The safety profile aligns with licensed COVID-19 mRNA vaccines; although reactogenicity is higher than with conventional vaccines, adverse reactions are predominantly mild-to-moderate and transient. Operationally, transitioning to single-dose pre-filled syringes alongside expanding refrigerated stability data significantly mitigates historical cold-chain bottlenecks. However, while standalone and combination mRNA platforms represent a major technological advance, real-world implementation challenges may affect their broader global health impact.

Frontiers in ImmunologyVol. 17
Intersil (United States) (US), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT), University of Genoa (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Influenza Virus Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.