Governing Digital‐Green Transitions: A Configurational Synthesis of Employment Outcomes

ABSTRACT Digital transformation and environmental sustainability are often framed as mutually reinforcing, yet their employment effects remain uneven across institutional and economic contexts. This study examines why digital transformation produces divergent employment outcomes in green transitions. Positioned within public affairs scholarship, this analysis examines how government policy, public‐sector digitalization, firm‐level green innovation, and citizen‐worker outcomes intersect in the digital‐green employment nexus. Drawing on a systematic review and configurational synthesis of 50 studies published between 2015 and 2025, the analysis distinguishes digital transformation across firm‐level capabilities, public digital governance, and regional digital infrastructure. The findings show that employment outcomes depend on the alignment of institutional quality, digital capability, workforce skills, industrial structure, and innovation mechanisms. Green innovation operates as a conditional pathway rather than a universal mediator. Four ideal‐type configurations are identified. The study contributes a public affairs framework linking governance capacity, policy credibility, business adaptation, and citizen trust in contemporary transition policy debates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Affairs
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.70157
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Governing Digital‐Green Transitions: A Configurational Synthesis of Employment Outcomes

Bora Ly
Journal of Public Affairs
Environmental Sustainability in Business
article

Governing Digital‐Green Transitions: A Configurational Synthesis of Employment Outcomes

Bora Ly
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Digital transformation and environmental sustainability are often framed as mutually reinforcing, yet their employment effects remain uneven across institutional and economic contexts. This study examines why digital transformation produces divergent employment outcomes in green transitions. Positioned within public affairs scholarship, this analysis examines how government policy, public‐sector digitalization, firm‐level green innovation, and citizen‐worker outcomes intersect in the digital‐green employment nexus. Drawing on a systematic review and configurational synthesis of 50 studies published between 2015 and 2025, the analysis distinguishes digital transformation across firm‐level capabilities, public digital governance, and regional digital infrastructure. The findings show that employment outcomes depend on the alignment of institutional quality, digital capability, workforce skills, industrial structure, and innovation mechanisms. Green innovation operates as a conditional pathway rather than a universal mediator. Four ideal‐type configurations are identified. The study contributes a public affairs framework linking governance capacity, policy credibility, business adaptation, and citizen trust in contemporary transition policy debates.

Journal of Public AffairsVol. 26(4)
Cambodia-Oxford Medical Research Unit (KH), Heilongjiang Institute of Technology (CN), Paññāsāstra University of Cambodia (KH)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.