Cognitive impacts of learning and using digital technology in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

= 0.11, 95% CI [0.03, 0.19]) compared with control conditions. These results suggest that digital exposure leads to cognitive benefits. However, the evidence is preliminary because the magnitude of the effect is small with substantial heterogeneity (95% Prediction interval [-0.31, 0.53]), and the underlying mechanism is unclear. Therefore, the practical implications of relying on digital exposure to prevent cognitive decline in the absence of structured programs or targeted interventions are limited. Future research needs to include granular, objectively quantified use metrics and incorporate psychosocial mediators to uncover the underlying mechanism of the observed benefit. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology and Aging
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0001028
Primary Topic
Technology Use by Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Cognitive impacts of learning and using digital technology in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shenghao Zhang, Gillian Gouveia, Dorota Kossowska-Kuhn
Psychology and Aging
Technology Use by Older Adults
article

Cognitive impacts of learning and using digital technology in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shenghao Zhang, Gillian Gouveia, Dorota Kossowska-Kuhn
article en

Abstract

= 0.11, 95% CI [0.03, 0.19]) compared with control conditions. These results suggest that digital exposure leads to cognitive benefits. However, the evidence is preliminary because the magnitude of the effect is small with substantial heterogeneity (95% Prediction interval [-0.31, 0.53]), and the underlying mechanism is unclear. Therefore, the practical implications of relying on digital exposure to prevent cognitive decline in the absence of structured programs or targeted interventions are limited. Future research needs to include granular, objectively quantified use metrics and incorporate psychosocial mediators to uncover the underlying mechanism of the observed benefit. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Psychology and Aging
Florida State University (US), Cornell University (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
National Institutes of Health
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Technology Use by Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cognitive impacts of learning and using digital technology in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. — Shenghao Zhang, Gillian Gouveia, et al. · Psychology and Aging (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS