Cardiovascular Effects of Chronic GIPR and GLP-1R Agonism in Lean and Diet-Induced Obese Mice: Sex Differences and Dose-Dependent Remodeling

Glucose‑dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon‑like peptide‑1 (GLP‑1) regulate metabolism and are increasingly targeted in therapies for type 2 diabetes and obesity. Although GLP‑1 receptor agonists confer cardiovascular benefits, the cardiovascular effects of GIP receptor (GIPR) stimulation remain controversial. This study aimed at defining the short-term cardiovascular consequences GIPR and GLP‑1 receptor (GLP‑1R) agonism in lean and diet‑induced obese mice, with emphasis on sex‑specific cardiac remodeling patterns. Male and female mice received continuous infusion of a GIPR or GLP‑1R agonist for one month at 0.1, 0.4, 0.8 and 1.0 mg/kg/day under chow feeding, or an effective dose of 0.8 mg/kg/day after 2 months of high‑fat diet (HFD)-induced obesity. Cardiovascular phenotyping included tail‑cuff blood pressure, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, metabolic testing, and assessment of plasma biomarkers of cardiac stress (ST2 or NT‑proBNP). In lean mice, GIPR agonism dose-dependently increased end‑diastolic volume (EDV), while GLP‑1R agonism increased end‑diastolic left‑ventricular (LV) mass in male mice, resulting in divergent remodeling patterns without affecting systolic function. These structural changes occurred without alterations in ST2 or NT‑proBNP, suggesting remodeling in the absence of overt myocardial stress. In obese mice, both agonists lowered mean arterial pressure and improved systolic function. GIPR agonism primarily increased LV volume in males, whereas GLP‑1R agonism increased LV mass in females. While ST2 levels were largely driven by HFD, NT‑proBNP was reduced by both treatments, consistent with improved cardiac loading conditions. In conclusion, short-term incretin receptor agonism induces distinct, context-dependent cardiovascular remodeling patterns that depended on receptor specificity, metabolic state, and sex. While both GIPR and GLP‑1R agonists exerted beneficial hemodynamic and functional effects in obesity, GIPR stimulation in lean mice increased ventricular volume and GLP‑1R stimulation increases mass without overt functional deterioration. These findings demonstrate distinct cardiac actions of incretin pathways and highlight the importance of metabolic context in their therapeutic effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00204.2026
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Cardiovascular Effects of Chronic GIPR and GLP-1R Agonism in Lean and Diet-Induced Obese Mice: Sex Differences and Dose-Dependent Remodeling

Annelise Francisco, João M. N. Duarte, Anja Meißner, Martin Magnusson et al.
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

Cardiovascular Effects of Chronic GIPR and GLP-1R Agonism in Lean and Diet-Induced Obese Mice: Sex Differences and Dose-Dependent Remodeling

Annelise Francisco, João M. N. Duarte, Anja Meißner, Martin Magnusson, Sevilay Goktas Sahoglu
article en

Abstract

Glucose‑dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon‑like peptide‑1 (GLP‑1) regulate metabolism and are increasingly targeted in therapies for type 2 diabetes and obesity. Although GLP‑1 receptor agonists confer cardiovascular benefits, the cardiovascular effects of GIP receptor (GIPR) stimulation remain controversial. This study aimed at defining the short-term cardiovascular consequences GIPR and GLP‑1 receptor (GLP‑1R) agonism in lean and diet‑induced obese mice, with emphasis on sex‑specific cardiac remodeling patterns. Male and female mice received continuous infusion of a GIPR or GLP‑1R agonist for one month at 0.1, 0.4, 0.8 and 1.0 mg/kg/day under chow feeding, or an effective dose of 0.8 mg/kg/day after 2 months of high‑fat diet (HFD)-induced obesity. Cardiovascular phenotyping included tail‑cuff blood pressure, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, metabolic testing, and assessment of plasma biomarkers of cardiac stress (ST2 or NT‑proBNP). In lean mice, GIPR agonism dose-dependently increased end‑diastolic volume (EDV), while GLP‑1R agonism increased end‑diastolic left‑ventricular (LV) mass in male mice, resulting in divergent remodeling patterns without affecting systolic function. These structural changes occurred without alterations in ST2 or NT‑proBNP, suggesting remodeling in the absence of overt myocardial stress. In obese mice, both agonists lowered mean arterial pressure and improved systolic function. GIPR agonism primarily increased LV volume in males, whereas GLP‑1R agonism increased LV mass in females. While ST2 levels were largely driven by HFD, NT‑proBNP was reduced by both treatments, consistent with improved cardiac loading conditions. In conclusion, short-term incretin receptor agonism induces distinct, context-dependent cardiovascular remodeling patterns that depended on receptor specificity, metabolic state, and sex. While both GIPR and GLP‑1R agonists exerted beneficial hemodynamic and functional effects in obesity, GIPR stimulation in lean mice increased ventricular volume and GLP‑1R stimulation increases mass without overt functional deterioration. These findings demonstrate distinct cardiac actions of incretin pathways and highlight the importance of metabolic context in their therapeutic effects.

American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
University of Augsburg (DE), Lund University (SE), North-West University (ZA), Skåne University Hospital (SE)
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse, Lund University Medical Faculty Foundation, HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.