Healthcare Workers’ Perspectives on 24-h Shift Work in Latvia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background/Objectives: Prolonged working shifts may adversely affect healthcare workers’ health, well-being, cognitive performance, and patient safety. Nevertheless, 24-h shifts remain commonly used in Latvian healthcare. This study aimed to examine healthcare workers’ experiences of 24-h shift work, their attitudes toward revising this work schedule, and the main reported reasons underlying their preferences. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Latvia between October 2025 and February 2026. A structured 64-item questionnaire assessed sociodemographic and professional characteristics, workload, shift patterns, health and emotional well-being, perceived patient-safety concerns, professional motivation, and attitudes toward alternative work schedules. Of 1524 submitted questionnaires, 1318 were included in the analysis. Quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics, while open-ended responses were examined using qualitative content analysis. Results: Most respondents regularly worked extended shifts, and 40.5% worked at more than one institution. More than half reported health changes that they perceived as potentially related to extended shift work, with 61.1% reporting emotional exhaustion and 49.2% reporting persistent fatigue. Fatigue during extended shift work had contributed to a self-reported error or perceived decline in care quality among 34.9% of respondents. Despite these concerns, a substantial proportion of participants preferred to retain 24-h shifts. Frequently reported reasons included schedule convenience, consecutive days off, financial considerations, and the ability to combine employment across multiple workplaces. Open-ended responses further highlighted preferences for flexibility, employee choice, adequate staffing, opportunities for rest, and consideration of financial consequences when revising work schedules. Conclusions: The findings demonstrate a tension between healthcare workers’ perceived health and patient-safety concerns associated with extended shift work and the practical and financial advantages associated with retaining 24-h shifts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14182993
Primary Topic
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Healthcare Workers’ Perspectives on 24-h Shift Work in Latvia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Olga Cerela-Boltunova
Healthcare
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
article

Healthcare Workers’ Perspectives on 24-h Shift Work in Latvia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Olga Cerela-Boltunova
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Prolonged working shifts may adversely affect healthcare workers’ health, well-being, cognitive performance, and patient safety. Nevertheless, 24-h shifts remain commonly used in Latvian healthcare. This study aimed to examine healthcare workers’ experiences of 24-h shift work, their attitudes toward revising this work schedule, and the main reported reasons underlying their preferences. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Latvia between October 2025 and February 2026. A structured 64-item questionnaire assessed sociodemographic and professional characteristics, workload, shift patterns, health and emotional well-being, perceived patient-safety concerns, professional motivation, and attitudes toward alternative work schedules. Of 1524 submitted questionnaires, 1318 were included in the analysis. Quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics, while open-ended responses were examined using qualitative content analysis. Results: Most respondents regularly worked extended shifts, and 40.5% worked at more than one institution. More than half reported health changes that they perceived as potentially related to extended shift work, with 61.1% reporting emotional exhaustion and 49.2% reporting persistent fatigue. Fatigue during extended shift work had contributed to a self-reported error or perceived decline in care quality among 34.9% of respondents. Despite these concerns, a substantial proportion of participants preferred to retain 24-h shifts. Frequently reported reasons included schedule convenience, consecutive days off, financial considerations, and the ability to combine employment across multiple workplaces. Open-ended responses further highlighted preferences for flexibility, employee choice, adequate staffing, opportunities for rest, and consideration of financial consequences when revising work schedules. Conclusions: The findings demonstrate a tension between healthcare workers’ perceived health and patient-safety concerns associated with extended shift work and the practical and financial advantages associated with retaining 24-h shifts.

HealthcareVol. 14(18)
Riga Stradiņš University (LV)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Healthcare Workers’ Perspectives on 24-h Shift Work in Latvia: A Cross-Sectional Study — Olga Cerela-Boltunova · Healthcare (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS