Exploring Cultural and Individual Differences in the Hierarchy of Moral Concern: Evidence From Student Samples Across 41 Cultural Groups

ABSTRACT Many important historical and contemporary ethical debates (e.g., on slavery, abortion and environmental protection) reflect disagreements about what we owe to different groups of individuals. Recent work in moral psychology has uncovered a seemingly replicable hierarchy of moral concern, but these studies were conducted in a few countries from the Anglosphere, raising doubts about cross‐cultural generalizability. Here, we analysed a data set with 6561 university students from 41 cultural groups to explore cultural and individual variation in moral concern. We find that (1) on average, across the 41 cultural groups, 11 of the 13 rankings in the typical hierarchy of moral concern replicated, pointing to substantial cultural similarities; (2) groups that are culturally more similar to the United States showed a pattern that was more similar to the pattern observed in the initial US studies; and (3) cultural differences were most pronounced when examining people's relative concern for non‐human animals and the environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Social Psychology
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.70114
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Cultural and Individual Differences in the Hierarchy of Moral Concern: Evidence From Student Samples Across 41 Cultural Groups

Kelly Kirkland, Charlie R. Crimston, Bastian Jaeger, Işıl Ayça Akkuş et al.
European Journal of Social Psychology
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

Exploring Cultural and Individual Differences in the Hierarchy of Moral Concern: Evidence From Student Samples Across 41 Cultural Groups

Kelly Kirkland, Charlie R. Crimston, Bastian Jaeger, Işıl Ayça Akkuş, Brock Bastian
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Many important historical and contemporary ethical debates (e.g., on slavery, abortion and environmental protection) reflect disagreements about what we owe to different groups of individuals. Recent work in moral psychology has uncovered a seemingly replicable hierarchy of moral concern, but these studies were conducted in a few countries from the Anglosphere, raising doubts about cross‐cultural generalizability. Here, we analysed a data set with 6561 university students from 41 cultural groups to explore cultural and individual variation in moral concern. We find that (1) on average, across the 41 cultural groups, 11 of the 13 rankings in the typical hierarchy of moral concern replicated, pointing to substantial cultural similarities; (2) groups that are culturally more similar to the United States showed a pattern that was more similar to the pattern observed in the initial US studies; and (3) cultural differences were most pronounced when examining people's relative concern for non‐human animals and the environment.

European Journal of Social Psychology
Australian National University (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Tilburg University (NL), Melbourne Health (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.