Comparing Classical Hopfield Networks and a Hybrid Quantum-Classical Associative Memory Model: Recall Accuracy, Noise Robustness, and Storage Capacity

Associative memory, the ability to reconstruct complete information from partial or noisy cues, is a defining feature of human cognition and an enduring objective in artificial intelligence. Classical neural models such as Hopfield networks have long provided insight into distributed storage and retrieval mechanisms, yet they remain constrained by limited storage capacity and susceptibility to noise. Recent developments in quantum computing have motivated investigation of hybrid quantum-classical architectures as alternative approaches to memory representation and retrieval. This study examines how effectively hybrid quantum-classical models can reproduce associative memory functions compared to Hopfield networks, with a particular focus on recall accuracy under varying noise levels, storage capacity, and computational efficiency. Through small-scale experiments using binary patterns and hybrid quantum circuits, we evaluate potential quantum advantages and practical trade-offs. The findings contribute to ongoing discourse in quantum machine learning and cognitive modeling, underscoring both the promise and current limitations of quantum-inspired associative memory systems. Our guiding research question is: To what extent can hybrid quantum–classical models replicate associative memory functions more effectively than classical neural memory models, particularly in terms of recall accuracy under noise and storage capacity?