Artificial Intelligence and Criminology

Machine learning is gaining momentum in criminology, and the unprecedented transformative power of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is poised to affect the discipline even more, perhaps in ways we currently struggle to imagine. In light of the growing role that AI plays in our field and in science overall, this article pursues three objectives. First, I trace the historical roots of AI in criminology and survey current trends to take stock of research in this area. Second, I outline five directions for future research that I deem strategic for criminology as a whole, surpassing the longstanding schism between quantitative and qualitative scholarship: going beyond the idea that AI solely works for prediction or forecasting, building AI literacy, fostering transdisciplinary collaboration, encouraging systematic and comparative algorithmic evaluation, embracing agentic AI, and raising open science standards. Third, I propose a fundamental shift in perspective for how we discuss AI in our discipline. As autonomous AI agents proliferate and interact with minimal human oversight, we must move beyond treating AI as a passive tool. I argue for developing a criminology of machines—a framework examining how artificial agents may themselves become channels or perpetrators of criminal behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Criminology
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-060326-043332
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence and Criminology

Gian Maria Campedelli
Annual Review of Criminology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Artificial Intelligence and Criminology

Gian Maria Campedelli
article en

Abstract

Machine learning is gaining momentum in criminology, and the unprecedented transformative power of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is poised to affect the discipline even more, perhaps in ways we currently struggle to imagine. In light of the growing role that AI plays in our field and in science overall, this article pursues three objectives. First, I trace the historical roots of AI in criminology and survey current trends to take stock of research in this area. Second, I outline five directions for future research that I deem strategic for criminology as a whole, surpassing the longstanding schism between quantitative and qualitative scholarship: going beyond the idea that AI solely works for prediction or forecasting, building AI literacy, fostering transdisciplinary collaboration, encouraging systematic and comparative algorithmic evaluation, embracing agentic AI, and raising open science standards. Third, I propose a fundamental shift in perspective for how we discuss AI in our discipline. As autonomous AI agents proliferate and interact with minimal human oversight, we must move beyond treating AI as a passive tool. I argue for developing a criminology of machines—a framework examining how artificial agents may themselves become channels or perpetrators of criminal behavior.

Annual Review of Criminology
University of Trento (IT), Fondazione Bruno Kessler (IT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.