A Scoring System Contributing to the Detection of Radiation Pneumonitis in Elderly Patients with Lung Cancer—Results of the POLCAR Trial

Background/Objectives: A symptom-based scoring system (0–9 points) for the identification of radiation pneumonitis was previously evaluated in lung cancer patients without age restrictions. A threshold of five points appeared optimal to detect pneumonitis. Since elderly patients have a higher pneumonitis risk, this threshold may not be valid for this group. The POLCAR trial evaluated performance and threshold selection in elderly patients. Methods: Diagnostic discrimination was assessed by receiver operating characteristic analysis. The areas under the curve (AUCs) and a null hypothesis that AUC equaled 0.7 were evaluated. Youden indices were used to identify candidate thresholds. In addition, the change from baseline and patient satisfaction were assessed. The dissatisfaction rate should be <20%. Results: Thirty new patients, plus 31 patients from another prospective trial with an almost identical design, qualified for analyses. The AUC for the pneumonitis score was 0.85 (95% confidence interval: 0.73–0.97). The highest Youden index (0.535) was observed for a threshold of four points. A threshold of five points led to a similar Youden index, a lower sensitivity, and higher specificity. An increase from the baseline by two points had a Youden index of 0.566 and a sensitivity of 100%, while an increase by three points had a Youden index of 0.550 and a specificity of 92.5%. Statistically superior discrimination for the change-from-baseline approach was not observed. The dissatisfaction rate was 5.4%. Conclusions: The scoring system showed good discrimination and high acceptance by patients. A threshold of four points appeared appropriate use in routine screening for the early detection of pneumonitis, whereas the change from baseline was considered useful as an exploratory tool when baseline data were available. Since only eight pneumonitis events occurred, threshold estimates require external validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18182973
Primary Topic
Effects of Radiation Exposure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Scoring System Contributing to the Detection of Radiation Pneumonitis in Elderly Patients with Lung Cancer—Results of the POLCAR Trial

Charlotte Kristiansen, Inga Zwaan, Stefan Janssen, Christian Felix Schulz et al.
Cancers
Effects of Radiation Exposure
article

A Scoring System Contributing to the Detection of Radiation Pneumonitis in Elderly Patients with Lung Cancer—Results of the POLCAR Trial

Charlotte Kristiansen, Inga Zwaan, Stefan Janssen, Christian Felix Schulz, CANSU DELIKANLI, Sabine Bohnet, Daphne Schepers-von Ohlen, Dirk Rades, Laura Doehring, Hanne Falk Grauslund, Elisa Marie Groh
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: A symptom-based scoring system (0–9 points) for the identification of radiation pneumonitis was previously evaluated in lung cancer patients without age restrictions. A threshold of five points appeared optimal to detect pneumonitis. Since elderly patients have a higher pneumonitis risk, this threshold may not be valid for this group. The POLCAR trial evaluated performance and threshold selection in elderly patients. Methods: Diagnostic discrimination was assessed by receiver operating characteristic analysis. The areas under the curve (AUCs) and a null hypothesis that AUC equaled 0.7 were evaluated. Youden indices were used to identify candidate thresholds. In addition, the change from baseline and patient satisfaction were assessed. The dissatisfaction rate should be <20%. Results: Thirty new patients, plus 31 patients from another prospective trial with an almost identical design, qualified for analyses. The AUC for the pneumonitis score was 0.85 (95% confidence interval: 0.73–0.97). The highest Youden index (0.535) was observed for a threshold of four points. A threshold of five points led to a similar Youden index, a lower sensitivity, and higher specificity. An increase from the baseline by two points had a Youden index of 0.566 and a sensitivity of 100%, while an increase by three points had a Youden index of 0.550 and a specificity of 92.5%. Statistically superior discrimination for the change-from-baseline approach was not observed. The dissatisfaction rate was 5.4%. Conclusions: The scoring system showed good discrimination and high acceptance by patients. A threshold of four points appeared appropriate use in routine screening for the early detection of pneumonitis, whereas the change from baseline was considered useful as an exploratory tool when baseline data were available. Since only eight pneumonitis events occurred, threshold estimates require external validation.

CancersVol. 18(18)
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE), Vejle Sygehus (DK), Institute for Integrative and Experimental Genomics (DE), University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE), Clinical Research Center Kiel (DE), University of Lübeck (DE)
Reduced inequalities, Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Effects of Radiation Exposure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.