A Calculus of Intelligence: Frontier, Adjudication, and Self-Modeling in Reflexive Systems Paper 59 of the NEMS Suite

Paper 58 established that nontrivial reflexive worlds are necessarily adjudicative and exhibit minimal reflexive intelligence under frontier-sensitive self-model-bearing closure. The present paper provides a formal calculus of intelligence: intelligence levels coincide with the chooser hierarchy; without frontier, there is no nontrivial intelligence; frontier-bearing reflexive systems admit precise intelligence levels; and distributed diversity strictly amplifies certified intelligence coverage. We prove the central theorem: terminal reflexive completion implies no minimal reflexive intelligence. The development is machine-checked in Lean 4 in the CalculusOfIntelligence library of reflexive-closure-lean . Trust boundary. "Intelligence levels" are bookkeeping over Paper 58's chooser hierarchy; distributed-acceleration claims lean on Paper 31 via an explicit Lean bridge. See .

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22733264
Primary Topic
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

A Calculus of Intelligence: Frontier, Adjudication, and Self-Modeling in Reflexive Systems Paper 59 of the NEMS Suite

Nova Spivack
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
preprint

A Calculus of Intelligence: Frontier, Adjudication, and Self-Modeling in Reflexive Systems Paper 59 of the NEMS Suite

Nova Spivack
preprint en

Abstract

Paper 58 established that nontrivial reflexive worlds are necessarily adjudicative and exhibit minimal reflexive intelligence under frontier-sensitive self-model-bearing closure. The present paper provides a formal calculus of intelligence: intelligence levels coincide with the chooser hierarchy; without frontier, there is no nontrivial intelligence; frontier-bearing reflexive systems admit precise intelligence levels; and distributed diversity strictly amplifies certified intelligence coverage. We prove the central theorem: terminal reflexive completion implies no minimal reflexive intelligence. The development is machine-checked in Lean 4 in the CalculusOfIntelligence library of reflexive-closure-lean . Trust boundary. "Intelligence levels" are bookkeeping over Paper 58's chooser hierarchy; distributed-acceleration claims lean on Paper 31 via an explicit Lean bridge. See .

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.