Decisional regret following avoidance of epidural analgesia in labor

Epidural analgesia (EPA) is a commonly employed technique of providing pain relief during labor. However, a subset of women elects to avoid this option, motivated by personal, cultural, or medical reasons. While the clinical outcomes of EPA have been widely studied, the emotional consequences of declining it, specifically decisional regret remain underexplored. To evaluate the prevalence of decisional regret among women who chose not to undergo EPA prior to delivery and identify clinical and demographic predictors associated with regret. We identified women documented as having chosen to avoid epidural analgesia (EPA) before delivery at our tertiary care center between 2021 and 2023. Inclusion criteria were age > 18 years and fluency in Hebrew; women with intrauterine fetal death and those who wanted EPA but did not get it were excluded. Clinical and demographic data were collected from medical records. Participants completed the Decision Regret Scale (DRS) by telephone interview. Regret was categorized as none (score 0), mild (1–25), and moderate-to-strong (26–100). Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher’s exact tests, and multivariable logistic regression were used for analysis. Of 207 eligible women, 200 (97%) completed the DRS at a median of 20 months postpartum. Any decisional regret (DRS > 0) was reported by 40% of participants; among women reporting regret, 95% had mild regret and only 4 women (2% of the total cohort) had moderate-to-strong regret. Absence of prior EPA experience was associated with greater odds of regret in the multivariable model (OR 5.69, p = 0.002). No significant associations were observed for age, parity, education, IVF conception, or maternal adverse events. Any decisional regret was frequent among women who declined epidural analgesia during labor, but it was almost always mild; only 2% of the cohort reported moderate-to-strong regret. Women without prior EPA experience appeared more likely to report regret. These findings support careful prenatal counseling and shared decision-making while highlighting the need for larger prospective studies with contemporaneous measures of pain and decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-026-09957-7
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decisional regret following avoidance of epidural analgesia in labor

Yuval Bar‐Yosef, Ann Dekalo, Giulia Barda, Anat Shmueli et al.
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Decisional regret following avoidance of epidural analgesia in labor

Yuval Bar‐Yosef, Ann Dekalo, Giulia Barda, Anat Shmueli, Matan Friedman, Eynat Avnieli
article en

Abstract

Epidural analgesia (EPA) is a commonly employed technique of providing pain relief during labor. However, a subset of women elects to avoid this option, motivated by personal, cultural, or medical reasons. While the clinical outcomes of EPA have been widely studied, the emotional consequences of declining it, specifically decisional regret remain underexplored. To evaluate the prevalence of decisional regret among women who chose not to undergo EPA prior to delivery and identify clinical and demographic predictors associated with regret. We identified women documented as having chosen to avoid epidural analgesia (EPA) before delivery at our tertiary care center between 2021 and 2023. Inclusion criteria were age > 18 years and fluency in Hebrew; women with intrauterine fetal death and those who wanted EPA but did not get it were excluded. Clinical and demographic data were collected from medical records. Participants completed the Decision Regret Scale (DRS) by telephone interview. Regret was categorized as none (score 0), mild (1–25), and moderate-to-strong (26–100). Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher’s exact tests, and multivariable logistic regression were used for analysis. Of 207 eligible women, 200 (97%) completed the DRS at a median of 20 months postpartum. Any decisional regret (DRS > 0) was reported by 40% of participants; among women reporting regret, 95% had mild regret and only 4 women (2% of the total cohort) had moderate-to-strong regret. Absence of prior EPA experience was associated with greater odds of regret in the multivariable model (OR 5.69, p = 0.002). No significant associations were observed for age, parity, education, IVF conception, or maternal adverse events. Any decisional regret was frequent among women who declined epidural analgesia during labor, but it was almost always mild; only 2% of the cohort reported moderate-to-strong regret. Women without prior EPA experience appeared more likely to report regret. These findings support careful prenatal counseling and shared decision-making while highlighting the need for larger prospective studies with contemporaneous measures of pain and decision-making.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Tel Aviv University (IL), Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (IL), Rabin Medical Center (IL), Wolfson Medical Center (IL)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.