Irreducible Agency (Non-Algorithmic Adjudication as a Physical Requirement) Paper 22 (T5) of the NEMS Suite

We formalize the theorem that in a Perfectly Self-Contained (PSC) universe with computers, the internal adjudicator network cannot operate via a total computable function. By merging the Diagonal Barrier (Papers 11–16) with Adjudicator Necessity (Paper 17) and Execution Necessity (Paper 19), we prove that a "dead" algorithmic law cannot reach a determinate state. The "law of physics" at the choice-resolution layer is strictly non-algorithmic. This establishes irreducible adjudication at the choice-resolution layer: internal record determinacy in a diagonal-capable PSC universe requires a non-total-effective adjudication mechanism. Observer-like subsystems are interpreted as the physical implementation of this mechanism within a record-stabilizing network. All definitions and conditional theorems are formalized and machine-checked in Lean 4. Trust boundary. Claims are conditional on the adjudicator-network and diagonal-barrier premises imported from earlier suite papers; the "non-algorithmic" layer is a precise non-total-effectivity statement in the formalized sense, not a blanket philosophy of mind. Cross-suite checks are in nems-lean . See .

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22733169
Primary Topic
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Irreducible Agency (Non-Algorithmic Adjudication as a Physical Requirement) Paper 22 (T5) of the NEMS Suite

Nova Spivack
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
preprint

Irreducible Agency (Non-Algorithmic Adjudication as a Physical Requirement) Paper 22 (T5) of the NEMS Suite

Nova Spivack
preprint en

Abstract

We formalize the theorem that in a Perfectly Self-Contained (PSC) universe with computers, the internal adjudicator network cannot operate via a total computable function. By merging the Diagonal Barrier (Papers 11–16) with Adjudicator Necessity (Paper 17) and Execution Necessity (Paper 19), we prove that a "dead" algorithmic law cannot reach a determinate state. The "law of physics" at the choice-resolution layer is strictly non-algorithmic. This establishes irreducible adjudication at the choice-resolution layer: internal record determinacy in a diagonal-capable PSC universe requires a non-total-effective adjudication mechanism. Observer-like subsystems are interpreted as the physical implementation of this mechanism within a record-stabilizing network. All definitions and conditional theorems are formalized and machine-checked in Lean 4. Trust boundary. Claims are conditional on the adjudicator-network and diagonal-barrier premises imported from earlier suite papers; the "non-algorithmic" layer is a precise non-total-effectivity statement in the formalized sense, not a blanket philosophy of mind. Cross-suite checks are in nems-lean . See .

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.