Beyond Policy-as-Code: Admissibility as a Runtime Primitive for Autonomous Systems

Autonomous AI systems increasingly generate their own execution paths, selecting tools, composing actions and proposing state changes dynamically. This technical paper examines the runtime governance problem created by that shift. Constitutional Computing does not replace established security mechanisms such as least privilege, capability security, reference monitors, Zero Trust or policy-as-code. It builds on those foundations and examines how their enforcement requirements apply when autonomous systems generate consequential execution paths dynamically. The paper develops the distinction between capability, permission, authorization and admissibility, and argues for deterministic consequence boundaries without requiring deterministic reasoning. Domain: Execution governance for autonomous AIObjective: Governed Autonomy Published by KeyWow.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22738519
Primary Topic
Access Control and Trust
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Policy-as-Code: Admissibility as a Runtime Primitive for Autonomous Systems

KeyWow
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Access Control and Trust
article

Beyond Policy-as-Code: Admissibility as a Runtime Primitive for Autonomous Systems

KeyWow
article en

Abstract

Autonomous AI systems increasingly generate their own execution paths, selecting tools, composing actions and proposing state changes dynamically. This technical paper examines the runtime governance problem created by that shift. Constitutional Computing does not replace established security mechanisms such as least privilege, capability security, reference monitors, Zero Trust or policy-as-code. It builds on those foundations and examines how their enforcement requirements apply when autonomous systems generate consequential execution paths dynamically. The paper develops the distinction between capability, permission, authorization and admissibility, and argues for deterministic consequence boundaries without requiring deterministic reasoning. Domain: Execution governance for autonomous AIObjective: Governed Autonomy Published by KeyWow.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Access Control and Trust
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.