Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Persian version of the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12-Pr) in young to middle-aged active adults with hip disorders

To our knowledge, no validated Persian version of the 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) has been published for assessing active adults with hip disorders. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Persian iHOT-12 (iHOT-12-Pr) in physically active Persian-speaking adults (18–60 years) with hip disorders. In this prospective methodological study, the iHOT-12 was translated according to established cross-cultural adaptation guidelines. The iHOT-12-Pr was completed by 126 active adults with hip disorders (Tegner Activity Scale ≥ 4) alongside the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Structural validity was assessed using parallel analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Test–retest reliability was evaluated in 68 clinically stable participants after 7–10 days. Responsiveness was examined in 40 patients 3 months after hip arthroscopy or arthroplasty using the Global Rating of Change (GRC) scale. Parallel analysis and CFA supported a one-factor structure (comparative fit index = 0.994). The iHOT-12-Pr demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.93) and test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.93–0.97). The standard error of measurement was 3.56, and the minimal detectable change at the 95% confidence level was 9.88 points. Construct validity was supported by strong correlations with HOOS subscales (ρ = 0.79–0.85) and moderate-to-strong correlations with the physical domains of the SF-36 (ρ = 0.63–0.70). Responsiveness was high among improved participants (effect size = 1.59; standardized response mean = 1.63), and change scores strongly correlated with GRC scores (ρ = 0.84). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.91, and the anchor-based minimal clinically important difference was 12.71 points. No floor or ceiling effects were observed. The iHOT-12-Pr demonstrated reliability, validity, and responsiveness in physically active Persian-speaking adults (18–60 years) with hip disorders. The established minimal clinically important difference exceeded the minimal detectable change, supporting interpretability of change scores for research and clinical follow-up in similar patient populations and settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-71164-3
Primary Topic
Hip disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Persian version of the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12-Pr) in young to middle-aged active adults with hip disorders

Afshin Taheriazam, Shabnam ShahAli, Mehdi Dadgoo, Hassan Jafari et al.
Scientific Reports
Hip disorders and treatments
article

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Persian version of the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12-Pr) in young to middle-aged active adults with hip disorders

Afshin Taheriazam, Shabnam ShahAli, Mehdi Dadgoo, Hassan Jafari, Mehdi Nasiri, Fatemeh Mollayi, Ismail Ebrahimi Takamjani
article en

Abstract

To our knowledge, no validated Persian version of the 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) has been published for assessing active adults with hip disorders. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Persian iHOT-12 (iHOT-12-Pr) in physically active Persian-speaking adults (18–60 years) with hip disorders. In this prospective methodological study, the iHOT-12 was translated according to established cross-cultural adaptation guidelines. The iHOT-12-Pr was completed by 126 active adults with hip disorders (Tegner Activity Scale ≥ 4) alongside the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Structural validity was assessed using parallel analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Test–retest reliability was evaluated in 68 clinically stable participants after 7–10 days. Responsiveness was examined in 40 patients 3 months after hip arthroscopy or arthroplasty using the Global Rating of Change (GRC) scale. Parallel analysis and CFA supported a one-factor structure (comparative fit index = 0.994). The iHOT-12-Pr demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.93) and test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.93–0.97). The standard error of measurement was 3.56, and the minimal detectable change at the 95% confidence level was 9.88 points. Construct validity was supported by strong correlations with HOOS subscales (ρ = 0.79–0.85) and moderate-to-strong correlations with the physical domains of the SF-36 (ρ = 0.63–0.70). Responsiveness was high among improved participants (effect size = 1.59; standardized response mean = 1.63), and change scores strongly correlated with GRC scores (ρ = 0.84). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.91, and the anchor-based minimal clinically important difference was 12.71 points. No floor or ceiling effects were observed. The iHOT-12-Pr demonstrated reliability, validity, and responsiveness in physically active Persian-speaking adults (18–60 years) with hip disorders. The established minimal clinically important difference exceeded the minimal detectable change, supporting interpretability of change scores for research and clinical follow-up in similar patient populations and settings.

Scientific Reports
Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR), King's College London (GB), Islamic Azad University Medical Branch of Tehran (IR), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Hip disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.