The Halo Effect in Large Language Models: A Multi-Model Study of Facial Attractiveness and Trait Attribution

This study investigates whether large language models (LLMs) exhibit the halo effect when evaluating synthetic human faces. Three LLMs (DeepSeek, Gemini, and ChatGPT) were presented with ten AI-generated facial images and asked to rate each face on five dimensions: physical attractiveness, perceived intelligence, perceived competence, perceived trustworthiness, and perceived friendliness. Pearson correlation coefficients were computed between attractiveness ratings and each trait dimension to quantify the halo effect. A fourth model, Claude (Anthropic), declined to complete the task across all three trials, citing ethical concerns about facial trait inference. Results indicate that all compliant models demonstrated measurable halo effects, with meaningful variation in magnitude and in agreement with a human rater baseline.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22739207
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The Halo Effect in Large Language Models: A Multi-Model Study of Facial Attractiveness and Trait Attribution

Lester Bogopolskiy
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
article

The Halo Effect in Large Language Models: A Multi-Model Study of Facial Attractiveness and Trait Attribution

Lester Bogopolskiy
article en

Abstract

This study investigates whether large language models (LLMs) exhibit the halo effect when evaluating synthetic human faces. Three LLMs (DeepSeek, Gemini, and ChatGPT) were presented with ten AI-generated facial images and asked to rate each face on five dimensions: physical attractiveness, perceived intelligence, perceived competence, perceived trustworthiness, and perceived friendliness. Pearson correlation coefficients were computed between attractiveness ratings and each trait dimension to quantify the halo effect. A fourth model, Claude (Anthropic), declined to complete the task across all three trials, citing ethical concerns about facial trait inference. Results indicate that all compliant models demonstrated measurable halo effects, with meaningful variation in magnitude and in agreement with a human rater baseline.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.