Flexural performance of plain concrete beams strengthened with vibrated conventional concrete and non‐vibrated SCC / FR ‐ SCC overlays

Abstract This study investigates the flexural strengthening of plain concrete beams using tensile‐face overlays of vibrated conventional concrete (CC), non‐vibrated self‐compacting concrete (SCC), and non‐vibrated fiber‐reinforced self‐compacting concrete (FR‐SCC). Locally developed SCC and FR‐SCC mixtures were used, with the FR‐SCC containing 0.5% by volume of 6 mm polypropylene fibers. Four‐point bending tests were performed on beams with overlay thicknesses of 25, 35, and 45 mm. All strengthened specimens exceeded their corresponding batch controls. FR‐SCC produced the highest mean ultimate load at every thickness, with batch‐normalized increases of 55.79%, 64.34%, and 85.78%. Two‐way ANOVA showed that overlay thickness significantly affected ultimate load, peak deflection, and energy absorption, while material type significantly affected ultimate load. No premature delamination was visually observed. FR‐SCC also exhibited the lowest sorptivity, approximately 47.73% lower than that of CC. The results indicate that locally developed, vibration‐free FR‐SCC overlays offer a promising strengthening option where conventional compaction is difficult or not feasible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structural Concrete
Published
2026-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.70792
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Flexural performance of plain concrete beams strengthened with vibrated conventional concrete and non‐vibrated SCC / FR ‐ SCC overlays

Özgür Eren, Cemal Agaoglu
Structural Concrete
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
article

Flexural performance of plain concrete beams strengthened with vibrated conventional concrete and non‐vibrated SCC / FR ‐ SCC overlays

Özgür Eren, Cemal Agaoglu
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the flexural strengthening of plain concrete beams using tensile‐face overlays of vibrated conventional concrete (CC), non‐vibrated self‐compacting concrete (SCC), and non‐vibrated fiber‐reinforced self‐compacting concrete (FR‐SCC). Locally developed SCC and FR‐SCC mixtures were used, with the FR‐SCC containing 0.5% by volume of 6 mm polypropylene fibers. Four‐point bending tests were performed on beams with overlay thicknesses of 25, 35, and 45 mm. All strengthened specimens exceeded their corresponding batch controls. FR‐SCC produced the highest mean ultimate load at every thickness, with batch‐normalized increases of 55.79%, 64.34%, and 85.78%. Two‐way ANOVA showed that overlay thickness significantly affected ultimate load, peak deflection, and energy absorption, while material type significantly affected ultimate load. No premature delamination was visually observed. FR‐SCC also exhibited the lowest sorptivity, approximately 47.73% lower than that of CC. The results indicate that locally developed, vibration‐free FR‐SCC overlays offer a promising strengthening option where conventional compaction is difficult or not feasible.

Structural Concrete
Eastern Mediterranean University (CY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Flexural performance of plain concrete beams strengthened with vibrated conventional concrete and non‐vibrated SCC / FR ‐ SCC overlays — Özgür Eren, Cemal Agaoglu · Structural Concrete (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS