Deep learning radiomics based on preoperative multiparametric MRI in predicting breast cancer recurrence risk

Breast cancer treatments are often tailored to recurrence risk to improve outcomes, but reliable risk stratification methods are lacking. To predict preoperative breast cancer recurrence risk through a tridimensional synergy model integrating breast MRI, radiomics, and deep learning. Retrospective. 428 female patients were randomly divided into training ( n = 299, 52.5 ± 12.2 years) and internal validation ( n = 129, 53.2 ± 11.5 years) sets, with an external validation set of 196 patients (51.3 ± 11.2 years). Multiparametric 3T MRI included fat-suppressed T2-weighted (T2WI) spin-echo, axial diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) with one pre- and five post-contrast axial acquisitions. We compared recurrence-free survival (RFS) prediction among DLR, DLC, and DLRC models, selected the optimal DLRC to stratify patients by risk, assessed RFS differences, and validated predictions, confirming effective risk stratification. Continuous corrected chi-squared tests, one-way ANOVA, log-rank test. A two-tailed P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The DL model showed predictive capability for 3-year RFS, with AUCs of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.65–0.84) in the training set, 0.74 (95% CI, 0.56–0.92) in the internal validation set, and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.53–0.78) in the external validation set. The DLR model achieved improved AUCs of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.74–0.90), 0.83 (95% CI: 0.73–0.93), and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.55–0.80) for predicting 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets, respectively. The DLC model outperformed the DL model alone. The DLRC model achieved the best performance in the training and internal validation sets. Its predictive ability remained discernible but was attenuated in the external validation set, with AUCs of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91–0.99), 0.89 (95% CI: 0.79–0.99), and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.67–0.91) across the respective datasets. The DLRC model effectively predicted and stratified breast cancer recurrence risk by integrating deep learning, radiomics, and clinicopathological features. 3. Stage 5.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Imaging
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02774-6
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Deep learning radiomics based on preoperative multiparametric MRI in predicting breast cancer recurrence risk

Changyu Zhou, Ruixin Zhang, Jidong Song, Sijia Fan et al.
BMC Medical Imaging
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

Deep learning radiomics based on preoperative multiparametric MRI in predicting breast cancer recurrence risk

Changyu Zhou, Ruixin Zhang, Jidong Song, Sijia Fan, Kaiting Wang, Yangyang Bu, Chunjie Wang, Meiqi Hua, Xinmiao Gong, Hao Zheng, Kepei Xu, Maosheng Xu, Yu Zhang
article en

Abstract

Breast cancer treatments are often tailored to recurrence risk to improve outcomes, but reliable risk stratification methods are lacking. To predict preoperative breast cancer recurrence risk through a tridimensional synergy model integrating breast MRI, radiomics, and deep learning. Retrospective. 428 female patients were randomly divided into training ( n = 299, 52.5 ± 12.2 years) and internal validation ( n = 129, 53.2 ± 11.5 years) sets, with an external validation set of 196 patients (51.3 ± 11.2 years). Multiparametric 3T MRI included fat-suppressed T2-weighted (T2WI) spin-echo, axial diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) with one pre- and five post-contrast axial acquisitions. We compared recurrence-free survival (RFS) prediction among DLR, DLC, and DLRC models, selected the optimal DLRC to stratify patients by risk, assessed RFS differences, and validated predictions, confirming effective risk stratification. Continuous corrected chi-squared tests, one-way ANOVA, log-rank test. A two-tailed P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The DL model showed predictive capability for 3-year RFS, with AUCs of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.65–0.84) in the training set, 0.74 (95% CI, 0.56–0.92) in the internal validation set, and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.53–0.78) in the external validation set. The DLR model achieved improved AUCs of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.74–0.90), 0.83 (95% CI: 0.73–0.93), and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.55–0.80) for predicting 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets, respectively. The DLC model outperformed the DL model alone. The DLRC model achieved the best performance in the training and internal validation sets. Its predictive ability remained discernible but was attenuated in the external validation set, with AUCs of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91–0.99), 0.89 (95% CI: 0.79–0.99), and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.67–0.91) across the respective datasets. The DLRC model effectively predicted and stratified breast cancer recurrence risk by integrating deep learning, radiomics, and clinicopathological features. 3. Stage 5.

BMC Medical Imaging
Zhejiang International Studies University (CN), Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (CN), North China Electric Power University (CN), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN), Huzhou Central Hospital (CN), Zhejiang Lab (CN), Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Westlake University, School of Medicine (CN)
Basic Public Welfare Research Program of Zhejiang Province
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.