Archives and memory: glimpses of abuse and violence in ex-POW homes

Focusing on family abuse and violence enacted by former prisoners of war (POWs) in Germany who suffered war- or captivity-related psychological disturbance, this article examines how abuse was interpreted and narrated across four distinct archival and personal sources: Department of Veterans’ Affairs case files, divorce records, family reflections and death commemorations. Moving beyond simple perpetrator – victim frameworks, this article argues that there is no single historical truth about abuse in the post-war home. Those who enacted abuse are variously viewed as traumatised veterans, difficult husbands, loving fathers, violent abusers and beloved dead. The article further argues that, for some families, the legacy of violence is intergenerational. Finally, it demonstrates that, for members of the second and third generations, trauma is a significant lens through which they view their own lived experience of abuse, allowing them to hold contradictory understandings of men who are both damaged and damaging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
History Australia
Published
2026-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14490854.2026.2727363
Primary Topic
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Archives and memory: glimpses of abuse and violence in ex-POW homes

Kristen Alexander
History Australia
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
article

Archives and memory: glimpses of abuse and violence in ex-POW homes

Kristen Alexander
article en

Abstract

Focusing on family abuse and violence enacted by former prisoners of war (POWs) in Germany who suffered war- or captivity-related psychological disturbance, this article examines how abuse was interpreted and narrated across four distinct archival and personal sources: Department of Veterans’ Affairs case files, divorce records, family reflections and death commemorations. Moving beyond simple perpetrator – victim frameworks, this article argues that there is no single historical truth about abuse in the post-war home. Those who enacted abuse are variously viewed as traumatised veterans, difficult husbands, loving fathers, violent abusers and beloved dead. The article further argues that, for some families, the legacy of violence is intergenerational. Finally, it demonstrates that, for members of the second and third generations, trauma is a significant lens through which they view their own lived experience of abuse, allowing them to hold contradictory understandings of men who are both damaged and damaging.

History Australia
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Australian Government
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.