Unveiling the Prediction of Lanthanide Binding Selectivity: Could 4f Electrons be Treated as the Core–Shell?

Abstract There has been a recent resurgence of interest in the lanthanide separation chemistry. With the advent of artificial intelligence, the high-throughput computation provides a powerful alternative to experimental screening of extractants. However, the reliable treatment of 4f electrons remains a major bottleneck due to their highly localized and strongly correlated nature. In this work, we systematically benchmark two prominent computational strategies including 4f-in-valence and 4f-in-core for calculating lanthanide binding selectivity. Within the 4f-in-valence framework, density functional theory (DFT) calculations yield irregular energetic trends across the lanthanide series. Multi-configurational and multi-reference methods can replicate the experimental selectivity trends, but they demand careful selection of the active space and the treatment of dynamic correlation, posing considerable computational difficulties. In contrast, the 4f-in-core approach, which excludes the chemically inert 4f orbitals from the valence space via 4f-in-core pseudopotentials (PPs), offers substantial improvements in computational efficiency. More importantly, the present results demonstrate that this scheme reliably reproduces key energetic trends, validating its applicability in non-redox lanthanide separation scenarios. This work establishes an efficient pathway by using 4f-in-core PPs for high-throughput computational screening of selective extractants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Inorganic Chemistry
Published
2026-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6c01833
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Unveiling the Prediction of Lanthanide Binding Selectivity: Could 4f Electrons be Treated as the Core–Shell?

Junjie Song, Jian‐Biao Liu, Jun‐Bo Lu, Yangbo Yang et al.
Inorganic Chemistry
Extraction and Separation Processes
article

Unveiling the Prediction of Lanthanide Binding Selectivity: Could 4f Electrons be Treated as the Core–Shell?

Junjie Song, Jian‐Biao Liu, Jun‐Bo Lu, Yangbo Yang, Yuefeng Zhou
article en

Abstract

Abstract There has been a recent resurgence of interest in the lanthanide separation chemistry. With the advent of artificial intelligence, the high-throughput computation provides a powerful alternative to experimental screening of extractants. However, the reliable treatment of 4f electrons remains a major bottleneck due to their highly localized and strongly correlated nature. In this work, we systematically benchmark two prominent computational strategies including 4f-in-valence and 4f-in-core for calculating lanthanide binding selectivity. Within the 4f-in-valence framework, density functional theory (DFT) calculations yield irregular energetic trends across the lanthanide series. Multi-configurational and multi-reference methods can replicate the experimental selectivity trends, but they demand careful selection of the active space and the treatment of dynamic correlation, posing considerable computational difficulties. In contrast, the 4f-in-core approach, which excludes the chemically inert 4f orbitals from the valence space via 4f-in-core pseudopotentials (PPs), offers substantial improvements in computational efficiency. More importantly, the present results demonstrate that this scheme reliably reproduces key energetic trends, validating its applicability in non-redox lanthanide separation scenarios. This work establishes an efficient pathway by using 4f-in-core PPs for high-throughput computational screening of selective extractants.

Inorganic Chemistry
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Chinese Academy of Engineering (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Extraction and Separation Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.