First United States Experience With Focal Pulsed‐Field Ablation Using the FARAPOINT Catheter for Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia

BACKGROUND: Drug-refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) after failed radiofrequency (RF) ablation remains a clinical challenge. Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is expanding to ventricular applications, but United States experience with focal pulsed-field-only catheters in VT is sparse, and pulsed-field platforms are not equivalent across manufacturers. Here we describe the first United States experience of FARAPOINT focal PFA in patients with refractory VT. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed ten consecutive patients who underwent VT ablation with the FARAPOINT (Boston Scientific) focal PFA catheter at a single VA Health Care System between July 2025 and May 2026. All patients had drug-refractory sustained monomorphic VT. Median age was 77 years with a mix of ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Six of ten had at least one prior failed catheter ablation. Acute non-inducibility was achieved in all nine patients who underwent formal post-ablation stimulation testing. No procedural complications occurred. Over a median follow-up of 95.5 days, sustained VT recurred in four of ten patients. No patient underwent repeat ablation, required mechanical circulatory support, or died. CONCLUSIONS: In this initial United States experience, FARAPOINT was safe and acutely effective in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy within a high-risk cohort with refractory VT and prior failed ablations, including challenging substrates. Prospective multicenter studies are warranted to expand these observations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Published
2026-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.70498
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

First United States Experience With Focal Pulsed‐Field Ablation Using the FARAPOINT Catheter for Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia

Jorge L. Reyes, Rezwan Munshi, Collin P. Goebel, Venkatakrishna N. Tholakanahalli
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
article

First United States Experience With Focal Pulsed‐Field Ablation Using the FARAPOINT Catheter for Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia

Jorge L. Reyes, Rezwan Munshi, Collin P. Goebel, Venkatakrishna N. Tholakanahalli
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Drug-refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) after failed radiofrequency (RF) ablation remains a clinical challenge. Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is expanding to ventricular applications, but United States experience with focal pulsed-field-only catheters in VT is sparse, and pulsed-field platforms are not equivalent across manufacturers. Here we describe the first United States experience of FARAPOINT focal PFA in patients with refractory VT. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed ten consecutive patients who underwent VT ablation with the FARAPOINT (Boston Scientific) focal PFA catheter at a single VA Health Care System between July 2025 and May 2026. All patients had drug-refractory sustained monomorphic VT. Median age was 77 years with a mix of ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Six of ten had at least one prior failed catheter ablation. Acute non-inducibility was achieved in all nine patients who underwent formal post-ablation stimulation testing. No procedural complications occurred. Over a median follow-up of 95.5 days, sustained VT recurred in four of ten patients. No patient underwent repeat ablation, required mechanical circulatory support, or died. CONCLUSIONS: In this initial United States experience, FARAPOINT was safe and acutely effective in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy within a high-risk cohort with refractory VT and prior failed ablations, including challenging substrates. Prospective multicenter studies are warranted to expand these observations.

Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Minneapolis VA Health Care System (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.