Local Dynamics, Global Semantics: A Closure Engine for Semantic Nonlocality Paper 45 of the NEMS Suite

We adopt a strong locality axiom at the Holds level: factorization—global satisfaction of observational propositions is the conjunction over fragments of a local predicate applied to the restricted world. This is algebraic, not geometric; no spacetime structure is assumed. Under factorization, same local views (same restriction at every fragment) imply observational equivalence; hence world-type is determined by the global map from fragments to local views. Interpretation: local dynamics alone do not guarantee local semantic closure; semantics is glued globally. A minimal toy (two fragments, observables as per-fragment claims) witnesses factorization and the main theorem. The development is mechanized in Lean 4 as the SemanticNonlocality library in nems-lean, with zero sorry and no custom axioms. Trust boundary. Factorization is an algebraic \Holds-level axiom, not a spacetime locality claim; interpretive "nonlocality" language is about semantic gluing, not signalling. Mechanization is nems-lean . See .

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22733224
Primary Topic
Logic, programming, and type systems
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Local Dynamics, Global Semantics: A Closure Engine for Semantic Nonlocality Paper 45 of the NEMS Suite

Nova Spivack
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Logic, programming, and type systems
preprint

Local Dynamics, Global Semantics: A Closure Engine for Semantic Nonlocality Paper 45 of the NEMS Suite

Nova Spivack
preprint en

Abstract

We adopt a strong locality axiom at the Holds level: factorization—global satisfaction of observational propositions is the conjunction over fragments of a local predicate applied to the restricted world. This is algebraic, not geometric; no spacetime structure is assumed. Under factorization, same local views (same restriction at every fragment) imply observational equivalence; hence world-type is determined by the global map from fragments to local views. Interpretation: local dynamics alone do not guarantee local semantic closure; semantics is glued globally. A minimal toy (two fragments, observables as per-fragment claims) witnesses factorization and the main theorem. The development is mechanized in Lean 4 as the SemanticNonlocality library in nems-lean, with zero sorry and no custom axioms. Trust boundary. Factorization is an algebraic \Holds-level axiom, not a spacetime locality claim; interpretive "nonlocality" language is about semantic gluing, not signalling. Mechanization is nems-lean . See .

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Logic, programming, and type systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.