Utilization of Carbon Fiber Spinal Instrumentation in Primary Spinal Tumors: Outcome Analysis from the AO Spine Primary Tumor Research and Outcomes Network

Background The use of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) instrumentation in spinal surgery has emerged as an alternative to traditional titanium-based implants in recent years. This study aims to evaluate the use and performance of carbon fiber instrumentation in patients with primary spinal tumors focusing on adverse event (AE) risk, overall survival and oncologic outcomes. Methods Data were collected from the AO Spine Primary Tumor Research and Outcomes Network (PTRON), a multicenter international registry. The primary endpoint was the incidence of AEs, while secondary endpoints included the risk of developing at least one AE, overall survival, local tumor control, and disease progression. Results A total of 359 patients enrolled in the PTRON registry met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Among them, 84 receiving carbon fiber implants (23%), 243 titanium implants (68%), and 32 a combination of both (9%). Median follow-up times were 1.9 years (IQR: 0.4-3.0), 1.3 years (IQR: 0.5-2.4) and 1.1 years (IQR: 0.5-1.7), in the carbon fiber, titanium and combination groups, respectively. The estimated risk of having at least one postoperative AE, including construct failures with and without loss of correction, wound infection (deep or superficial), non-union and wound dehiscence, was statistically comparable between patients receiving carbon fiber, titanium or a combination of both carbon fiber and titanium implants ( P > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models showed no significant differences in overall survival, recurrence-free survival, or progression-free survival between the implant groups. Conclusion Carbon fiber spinal implants demonstrate a comparable safety and oncologic profile to traditional titanium implants while allowing for improved tumor surveillance and easier radiation delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Spine Journal
Published
2026-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682261417978
Primary Topic
Management of metastatic bone disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Utilization of Carbon Fiber Spinal Instrumentation in Primary Spinal Tumors: Outcome Analysis from the AO Spine Primary Tumor Research and Outcomes Network

Michelle J. Clarke, Áron Lazáry, Laurence D. Rhines, Marie‐Laure Vial et al.
Global Spine Journal
Management of metastatic bone disease
article

Utilization of Carbon Fiber Spinal Instrumentation in Primary Spinal Tumors: Outcome Analysis from the AO Spine Primary Tumor Research and Outcomes Network

Michelle J. Clarke, Áron Lazáry, Laurence D. Rhines, Marie‐Laure Vial, Gisberto Evangelisti, Stefano Boriani, Daniel G. Tobert, Riccardo Cecchinato, Cordula Netzer, on behalf of AO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor, Alexander C. Disch, J. Reynolds, Alessandro Luzzati, Arjun Sahgal, Alessandro Gasbarrini, Ziya L. Gokaslan, Praveen V. Mummaneni, Ori Barzilai, Ilya Laufer, Feng Wei, Chetan Bettegowda, Charles G. Fisher, Nicolas Dea, Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
article en

Abstract

Background The use of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) instrumentation in spinal surgery has emerged as an alternative to traditional titanium-based implants in recent years. This study aims to evaluate the use and performance of carbon fiber instrumentation in patients with primary spinal tumors focusing on adverse event (AE) risk, overall survival and oncologic outcomes. Methods Data were collected from the AO Spine Primary Tumor Research and Outcomes Network (PTRON), a multicenter international registry. The primary endpoint was the incidence of AEs, while secondary endpoints included the risk of developing at least one AE, overall survival, local tumor control, and disease progression. Results A total of 359 patients enrolled in the PTRON registry met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Among them, 84 receiving carbon fiber implants (23%), 243 titanium implants (68%), and 32 a combination of both (9%). Median follow-up times were 1.9 years (IQR: 0.4-3.0), 1.3 years (IQR: 0.5-2.4) and 1.1 years (IQR: 0.5-1.7), in the carbon fiber, titanium and combination groups, respectively. The estimated risk of having at least one postoperative AE, including construct failures with and without loss of correction, wound infection (deep or superficial), non-union and wound dehiscence, was statistically comparable between patients receiving carbon fiber, titanium or a combination of both carbon fiber and titanium implants ( P > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models showed no significant differences in overall survival, recurrence-free survival, or progression-free survival between the implant groups. Conclusion Carbon fiber spinal implants demonstrate a comparable safety and oncologic profile to traditional titanium implants while allowing for improved tumor surveillance and easier radiation delivery.

Global Spine Journal
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), University of British Columbia (CA), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Toronto (CA), University of Milan (IT), Peking University (CN), AO Foundation (CH), Brown University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Buda Health Center (HU), WinnMed (US), University Hospital of Basel (CH), University of California System (US), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), NYU Langone Health (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio (IT), Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi (IT), Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli (IT), Peking University Third Hospital (CN), Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Management of metastatic bone disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.