The No External Model Selection Theorem Semantic Closure, Categoricity, and Diagonalization Constraints

We study the structural consequences of no external model selection: the requirement that a realized world is not chosen by ontologically external information among observationally inequivalent realizations of a finite law-description. We formalize a minimal axiom package consisting of (i) single actuality for observational records, (ii) no external selection among observationally inequivalent models, (iii) a finite syntactic description, (iv) exclusion of unconstrained completion data ("free bits"), and (v) sufficient expressiveness for self-reference. From these assumptions we derive a model-theoretic dichotomy: either the law-description is categorical up to observables or the realized system contains an internal selection functional. We then prove that, under explicit self-reference hypotheses, any such selection mechanism cannot be a total effective functional on the diagonal fragment, yielding a sharp refinement into restricted/stratified versus non-effective internal selection. The resulting classification theorem partitions all candidate universes and, more generally, all autonomous self-modeling systems satisfying the axioms into a small number of universality classes. The classification theorem applies to systems satisfying the explicit axiom package A0–A5 relative to a designated observational fragment; it is not a claim about arbitrary systems absent that structure. Applications and domain-specific consequences are treated separately as corollaries under additional premises. This overview presents the core NEMS theorem engine and selected applications; stronger domain-specific derivation and ontological synthesis claims belong to separate release surfaces with their own premise bundles and formal artifacts. The framework quantifies over arbitrary systems admitting a finite law-description and a designated observational fragment; it does not presuppose any specific physical theory, dynamics, or ontology. Trust boundary. This paper is the suite anchor for the axiom package A0–A5 and the classification theorem; machine-checked alignment is recorded in nems-lean . See .

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22733123
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

The No External Model Selection Theorem Semantic Closure, Categoricity, and Diagonalization Constraints

Nova Spivack
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Philosophy and History of Science
preprint

The No External Model Selection Theorem Semantic Closure, Categoricity, and Diagonalization Constraints

Nova Spivack
preprint en

Abstract

We study the structural consequences of no external model selection: the requirement that a realized world is not chosen by ontologically external information among observationally inequivalent realizations of a finite law-description. We formalize a minimal axiom package consisting of (i) single actuality for observational records, (ii) no external selection among observationally inequivalent models, (iii) a finite syntactic description, (iv) exclusion of unconstrained completion data ("free bits"), and (v) sufficient expressiveness for self-reference. From these assumptions we derive a model-theoretic dichotomy: either the law-description is categorical up to observables or the realized system contains an internal selection functional. We then prove that, under explicit self-reference hypotheses, any such selection mechanism cannot be a total effective functional on the diagonal fragment, yielding a sharp refinement into restricted/stratified versus non-effective internal selection. The resulting classification theorem partitions all candidate universes and, more generally, all autonomous self-modeling systems satisfying the axioms into a small number of universality classes. The classification theorem applies to systems satisfying the explicit axiom package A0–A5 relative to a designated observational fragment; it is not a claim about arbitrary systems absent that structure. Applications and domain-specific consequences are treated separately as corollaries under additional premises. This overview presents the core NEMS theorem engine and selected applications; stronger domain-specific derivation and ontological synthesis claims belong to separate release surfaces with their own premise bundles and formal artifacts. The framework quantifies over arbitrary systems admitting a finite law-description and a designated observational fragment; it does not presuppose any specific physical theory, dynamics, or ontology. Trust boundary. This paper is the suite anchor for the axiom package A0–A5 and the classification theorem; machine-checked alignment is recorded in nems-lean . See .

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Philosophy and History of Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.