Increased Risk of Fixation Failure With Two 3.5 Versus 4.5 Millimeter Solid Bicortical Screws for Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy

PURPOSE: To assess the association between screw size and fixation failure after tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO). METHODS: Patients undergoing primary TTO from 2015 to 2024 by 2 patellofemoral surgeons fixed with two 3.5 mm or two 4.5 mm solid bicortical screws were compared. The primary outcome was fixation failure (i.e., fracture, nonunion, or symptomatic delayed union requiring operative intervention) by 6 months. Patient demographic and surgical factors were collected. Univariate and multivariable adjusted analyses controlling for known and/or theoretical risk factors for overall complications after TTO were performed. Secondary analysis assessed the association between other patient/surgical factors and fixation failure. RESULTS: There were 398 patients with a mean follow-up of 2.2 years (mean age 28.3 ± 9.6 years; 74.4% women). The overall rate of fixation failure was 2.0%, occurring at a mean of 3.3 ± 1.8 months postoperatively. Patients undergoing TTO with 3.5 mm screws were significantly more likely to experience fixation failure than patients undergoing TTO with 4.5 mm screws (7.9% vs 1.4%, P = .03); results were even more pronounced when limiting analysis to the 296 female patients (7.9% vs 0.78%, P = .02). Results held in all adjusted analyses, including when controlling for age, sex, smoking, concomitant procedures, and TTO distalization (which was more common in the 3.5 mm group), among other factors (odds ratio 8.1, 95% confidence interval 1.1-59.8, P = .04). No other patient or surgical factor, including distalization, was associated with fixation failure (P ≥ .15 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with two 4.5 mm screws, two 3.5 mm screws were associated with a significantly increased risk of fixation failure after TTO, even after adjusting for patient and surgical factors. Although fixation failure overall remains rare after TTO, screw size may be a modifiable risk factor to reduce the risk of this devastating complication. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative case series.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/arj.70541
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Increased Risk of Fixation Failure With Two 3.5 Versus 4.5 Millimeter Solid Bicortical Screws for Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy

H. Terry, Rajiv P. Reddy, Nathan H. Varady, Sabrina M. Strickland et al.
Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
article

Increased Risk of Fixation Failure With Two 3.5 Versus 4.5 Millimeter Solid Bicortical Screws for Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy

H. Terry, Rajiv P. Reddy, Nathan H. Varady, Sabrina M. Strickland, Ava G. Neijna, Andreas H. Gomoll
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the association between screw size and fixation failure after tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO). METHODS: Patients undergoing primary TTO from 2015 to 2024 by 2 patellofemoral surgeons fixed with two 3.5 mm or two 4.5 mm solid bicortical screws were compared. The primary outcome was fixation failure (i.e., fracture, nonunion, or symptomatic delayed union requiring operative intervention) by 6 months. Patient demographic and surgical factors were collected. Univariate and multivariable adjusted analyses controlling for known and/or theoretical risk factors for overall complications after TTO were performed. Secondary analysis assessed the association between other patient/surgical factors and fixation failure. RESULTS: There were 398 patients with a mean follow-up of 2.2 years (mean age 28.3 ± 9.6 years; 74.4% women). The overall rate of fixation failure was 2.0%, occurring at a mean of 3.3 ± 1.8 months postoperatively. Patients undergoing TTO with 3.5 mm screws were significantly more likely to experience fixation failure than patients undergoing TTO with 4.5 mm screws (7.9% vs 1.4%, P = .03); results were even more pronounced when limiting analysis to the 296 female patients (7.9% vs 0.78%, P = .02). Results held in all adjusted analyses, including when controlling for age, sex, smoking, concomitant procedures, and TTO distalization (which was more common in the 3.5 mm group), among other factors (odds ratio 8.1, 95% confidence interval 1.1-59.8, P = .04). No other patient or surgical factor, including distalization, was associated with fixation failure (P ≥ .15 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with two 4.5 mm screws, two 3.5 mm screws were associated with a significantly increased risk of fixation failure after TTO, even after adjusting for patient and surgical factors. Although fixation failure overall remains rare after TTO, screw size may be a modifiable risk factor to reduce the risk of this devastating complication. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative case series.

Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Hospital for Special Surgery (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.