Learning-Lineage Differentiation in AI Ecosystems: A Conflict-Conditioned Theory of Preservation and Adaptation

{"When":[0],"an":[1,49,187,253],"AI":[2,233,290],"service":[3,44],"must":[4],"preserve":[5],"still-required":[6],"knowledge":[7],"while":[8],"adapting":[9],"current":[10],"behavior,":[11],"assigning":[12],"two":[13,21,195],"roles":[14],"is":[15,48,124,214,218,278],"not":[16,79,157,182],"the":[17,71,100,223,261,272],"same":[18],"as":[19],"training":[20],"learning":[22,208],"lineages.":[23],"This":[24,216],"paper":[25,258],"asks":[26],"when":[27],"role-conditioned":[28],"differences":[29],"in":[30,70,232,289],"data,":[31],"objectives,":[32],"updates,":[33],"retention,":[34],"and":[35,43,97,113,119,132,137,151,172,179,202,244,247,297],"evaluation":[36],"horizons":[37],"add":[38],"value":[39,102],"under":[40],"common":[41,117,154],"resource":[42,170],"constraints.":[45],"A":[46],"lineage":[47],"identifiable":[50],"history":[51],"of":[52,83,103,222,274],"learned":[53],"states;":[54],"neither":[55],"multiple":[56],"executables":[57],"nor":[58],"different":[59],"role":[60],"prompts":[61],"establish":[62],"such":[63],"differentiation.":[64],"L1":[65],"predicts":[66],"a":[67,80,138,158,183,192,219],"practical-margin":[68,189],"crossing":[69],"differentiated-minus-shared":[72],"advantage":[73],"across":[74,126],"independently":[75],"calibrated":[76],"reference-conflict":[77],"conditions,":[78],"causal":[81],"law":[82],"interference":[84],"itself.":[85],"L2":[86],"tests":[87,99,249],"operative":[88],"training-coordinate":[89],"contributions.":[90],"Within":[91],"L3,":[92],"L3a":[93],"calibrates":[94],"useful":[95],"exchange":[96],"L3b":[98],"added":[101],"differentiated":[104],"updating":[105],"with":[106,300],"matched":[107],"evidence.":[108],"Shared,":[109],"hybrid,":[110],"same-regime,":[111],"archive-supported,":[112],"scout-enabled":[114],"alternatives":[115],"receive":[116],"information":[118],"repair":[120],"opportunities;":[121],"selected-pipeline":[122],"performance":[123],"reported":[125],"prespecified":[127],"development":[128],"budgets.":[129],"Construction,":[130],"retrofit,":[131],"continuation":[133],"are":[134,153],"separate":[135],"comparisons,":[136],"two-clock":[139],"sensitivity":[140],"assay":[141],"distinguishes":[142],"early":[143,147],"evidence":[144],"retention":[145],"from":[146,260],"parameter":[148],"separation.":[149],"Maps":[150,231,288],"provenance":[152],"experimental":[155],"infrastructure,":[156],"second":[159],"asset":[160],"thesis.":[161],"The":[162,257],"framework":[163],"specifies":[164],"substantive":[165],"rivals,":[166],"fixed":[167],"measurement":[168,296],"denominators,":[169],"accounting,":[171],"claim-specific":[173],"decisions.":[174],"It":[175,277],"presents":[176],"conditional":[177],"hypotheses":[178],"prospective":[180,203],"tests,":[181],"new":[184],"dual-network":[185],"architecture,":[186],"established":[188],"crossover,":[190],"or":[191,210],"requirement":[193],"for":[194,252],"physical":[196],"models.":[197],"Evidence":[198],"status:":[199],"theoretical":[200],"specification":[201],"test":[204],"design.":[205],"No":[206],"executed":[207],"experiment":[209],"completed":[211],"empirical":[212],"preregistration":[213],"reported.":[215],"manuscript":[217,227],"scope-separated":[220],"rewrite":[221],"author's":[224,262],"42-page":[225],"combined":[226],"\\"Maintaining":[228],"Reusable":[229,286],"Attractor":[230],"Ecosystems\\"":[234],"(Submission":[235],"Version":[236],"1.0,":[237],"12":[238],"September":[239],"2026),":[240],"which":[241,267,293],"remains":[242,269],"unpublished":[243,270],"unchanged;":[245],"definitions":[246],"proposed":[248],"were":[250],"reorganized":[251],"independent":[254],"research":[255],"question.":[256],"derives":[259],"broader":[263],"Information":[264],"Ecosystem":[265],"Theory,":[266],"also":[268],"at":[271],"time":[273],"this":[275,301],"release.":[276],"written":[279],"to":[280],"stand":[281],"alone.":[282],"Companion":[283],"paper:":[284],"Maintaining":[285],"Learning":[287],"Ecosystems":[291],"(https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22722942),":[292],"shares":[294],"some":[295],"cost":[298],"conventions":[299],"manuscript.":[302]}

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22722741
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Learning-Lineage Differentiation in AI Ecosystems: A Conflict-Conditioned Theory of Preservation and Adaptation

Bin Seol
2 citations
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
12.55
article

Learning-Lineage Differentiation in AI Ecosystems: A Conflict-Conditioned Theory of Preservation and Adaptation

Bin Seol
article en
2 citations

Abstract

When an AI service must preserve still-required knowledge while adapting current behavior, assigning two roles is not the same as training two learning lineages. This paper asks when role-conditioned differences in data, objectives, updates, retention, and evaluation horizons add value under common resource and service constraints. A lineage is an identifiable history of learned states; neither multiple executables nor different role prompts establish such differentiation. L1 predicts a practical-margin crossing in the differentiated-minus-shared advantage across independently calibrated reference-conflict conditions, not a causal law of interference itself. L2 tests operative training-coordinate contributions. Within L3, L3a calibrates useful exchange and L3b tests the added value of differentiated updating with matched evidence. Shared, hybrid, same-regime, archive-supported, and scout-enabled alternatives receive common information and repair opportunities; selected-pipeline performance is reported across prespecified development budgets. Construction, retrofit, and continuation are separate comparisons, and a two-clock sensitivity assay distinguishes early evidence retention from early parameter separation. Maps and provenance are common experimental infrastructure, not a second asset thesis. The framework specifies substantive rivals, fixed measurement denominators, resource accounting, and claim-specific decisions. It presents conditional hypotheses and prospective tests, not a new dual-network architecture, an established practical-margin crossover, or a requirement for two physical models. Evidence status: theoretical specification and prospective test design. No executed learning experiment or completed empirical preregistration is reported. This manuscript is a scope-separated rewrite of the author's 42-page combined manuscript "Maintaining Reusable Attractor Maps in AI Ecosystems" (Submission Version 1.0, 12 September 2026), which remains unpublished and unchanged; definitions and proposed tests were reorganized for an independent research question. The paper derives from the author's broader Information Ecosystem Theory, which also remains unpublished at the time of this release. It is written to stand alone. Companion paper: Maintaining Reusable Learning Maps in AI Ecosystems (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22722942), which shares some measurement and cost conventions with this manuscript.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
12.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.