CLDN18.2 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Biomarker assessment, spatial heterogeneity and therapeutic modality selection

Abstract Background Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) is expressed in a subset of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) and is under clinical development as a target for monoclonal antibodies, antibody‐drug conjugates, immune‐cell engagers, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‐cell therapies. The testing and clinical‐development pathways established in gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers provide a useful reference for PDAC; however, PDAC studies have yet to standardize the antibodies, specimen types, scoring methods, or positivity thresholds used for patient selection. Intratumoral and interlesional heterogeneity, discordance between primary and metastatic sites, and changes in membrane localization limit the ability of a single positive or negative sample to capture the tumor's antigenic state. Therapeutic modalities also differ in their requirements for membrane‐antigen coverage, spatial distribution, and the tumor microenvironment. Methods This narrative review draws on peer‐reviewed articles, regulatory documents, ClinicalTrials.gov records, and relevant conference abstracts available through 31 July 2026. This review examines the biological basis, pathological assessment, spatial heterogeneity, and therapeutic development of CLDN18.2 in PDAC, with particular emphasis on treatment selection across different expression states. Results At baseline, the percentage of tumor cells with 2+/3+ membranous staining is used to describe antigen coverage, H‐score complements this measure by capturing overall expression, and intratumoral and interlesional distribution and specimen representativeness are recorded separately. Conclusion These findings support the selection of monoclonal antibodies, antibody‐drug conjugates, immune‐cell engagers, and CAR T‐cell therapy according to antigen coverage and spatial distribution, as well as treatment sequencing after disease progression.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Translational Discovery
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ctd2.70202
Primary Topic
Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CLDN18.2 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Biomarker assessment, spatial heterogeneity and therapeutic modality selection

Jinfei Chen, Jiaxin Wang, Daniel Ansari, Zhexin Zhang et al.
Clinical and Translational Discovery
Barrier Structure and Function Studies
article

CLDN18.2 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Biomarker assessment, spatial heterogeneity and therapeutic modality selection

Jinfei Chen, Jiaxin Wang, Daniel Ansari, Zhexin Zhang, Ruyu Tan, Roland Andersson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) is expressed in a subset of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) and is under clinical development as a target for monoclonal antibodies, antibody‐drug conjugates, immune‐cell engagers, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‐cell therapies. The testing and clinical‐development pathways established in gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers provide a useful reference for PDAC; however, PDAC studies have yet to standardize the antibodies, specimen types, scoring methods, or positivity thresholds used for patient selection. Intratumoral and interlesional heterogeneity, discordance between primary and metastatic sites, and changes in membrane localization limit the ability of a single positive or negative sample to capture the tumor's antigenic state. Therapeutic modalities also differ in their requirements for membrane‐antigen coverage, spatial distribution, and the tumor microenvironment. Methods This narrative review draws on peer‐reviewed articles, regulatory documents, ClinicalTrials.gov records, and relevant conference abstracts available through 31 July 2026. This review examines the biological basis, pathological assessment, spatial heterogeneity, and therapeutic development of CLDN18.2 in PDAC, with particular emphasis on treatment selection across different expression states. Results At baseline, the percentage of tumor cells with 2+/3+ membranous staining is used to describe antigen coverage, H‐score complements this measure by capturing overall expression, and intratumoral and interlesional distribution and specimen representativeness are recorded separately. Conclusion These findings support the selection of monoclonal antibodies, antibody‐drug conjugates, immune‐cell engagers, and CAR T‐cell therapy according to antigen coverage and spatial distribution, as well as treatment sequencing after disease progression.

Clinical and Translational DiscoveryVol. 6(5)
Lund University (SE), Wenzhou Medical University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (CN), Skåne University Hospital (SE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Barrier Structure and Function Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.