Extractive rearticulation and lithium governance in Ghana

The growing demand for critical minerals has positioned lithium at the center of global energy transition, raising questions about how expanding extraction is governed in resource-producing countries. This paper examines Ghana's Ewoyaa Lithium Project to analyze how established extractive relations are reorganized as mining becomes embedded within the political, institutional, and developmental imperatives of decarbonization. Drawing on qualitative fieldwork, including interviews, community discussions, participant observation, and secondary literature, the study examines interactions among state institutions, affected communities, civil society actors, traditional authorities, and project proponents. The paper advances the concept of extractive rearticulation to explain how established extractive relations are reorganized and legitimized through the policies, institutions and narratives of the energy transition. The findings show that political contestation and institutional constraints generate governance uncertainty; stakeholder engagement expands procedural inclusion while providing limited influence over substantive decisions; and anticipated extraction constrains land use and livelihood investment before physical relocation or mineral production. Building on existing scholarship, the study applies and refines anticipatory dispossession to explain how prolonged uncertainty surrounding land acquisition, compensation, and project implementation constrains livelihood decisions before physical relocation or extraction. It identifies anticipatory dispossession as a material-temporal mechanism through which physical possession can persist while effective control over land and livelihood futures progressively narrows. The paper demonstrates how new critical mineral governance arrangements can coexist with enduring asymmetries in authority and risk, underscoring the need for stronger regulatory capacity, meaningful community influence, and livelihood protection throughout the pre-extraction phase.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Resources Policy
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2026.106061
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extractive rearticulation and lithium governance in Ghana

Phil Faanu
Resources Policy
Extraction and Separation Processes
article

Extractive rearticulation and lithium governance in Ghana

Phil Faanu
article en

Abstract

The growing demand for critical minerals has positioned lithium at the center of global energy transition, raising questions about how expanding extraction is governed in resource-producing countries. This paper examines Ghana's Ewoyaa Lithium Project to analyze how established extractive relations are reorganized as mining becomes embedded within the political, institutional, and developmental imperatives of decarbonization. Drawing on qualitative fieldwork, including interviews, community discussions, participant observation, and secondary literature, the study examines interactions among state institutions, affected communities, civil society actors, traditional authorities, and project proponents. The paper advances the concept of extractive rearticulation to explain how established extractive relations are reorganized and legitimized through the policies, institutions and narratives of the energy transition. The findings show that political contestation and institutional constraints generate governance uncertainty; stakeholder engagement expands procedural inclusion while providing limited influence over substantive decisions; and anticipated extraction constrains land use and livelihood investment before physical relocation or mineral production. Building on existing scholarship, the study applies and refines anticipatory dispossession to explain how prolonged uncertainty surrounding land acquisition, compensation, and project implementation constrains livelihood decisions before physical relocation or extraction. It identifies anticipatory dispossession as a material-temporal mechanism through which physical possession can persist while effective control over land and livelihood futures progressively narrows. The paper demonstrates how new critical mineral governance arrangements can coexist with enduring asymmetries in authority and risk, underscoring the need for stronger regulatory capacity, meaningful community influence, and livelihood protection throughout the pre-extraction phase.

Resources PolicyVol. 122
McMaster University (CA)
McMaster University, International Development Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Extraction and Separation Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.