Eroding operations while elevating innovation: a dual-mechanism model of supplier list disclosure

Purpose Supplier list disclosure has become a defining feature of contemporary supply chain transparency, yet leading firms exhibit strikingly divergent disclosure choices and the empirical literature reports both benefits and costs. Drawing on the relational view and signaling theory, we develop and test a dual-mechanism framework explaining how proactive supplier list disclosure simultaneously erodes operational performance while enhancing innovation performance, and identify the conditions that amplify each effect. Design/methodology/approach Using panel data from Chinese listed firms from 2012 to 2024, we empirically test the relationships between supplier list disclosure and firms' operational and innovation performance. To validate the relational mechanism underlying disclosure's impact on operational performance, we test the moderating roles of supplier concentration and buyer competition. To validate the signaling mechanism underlying disclosure's impact on innovation performance, we test the moderating roles of media coverage and CSR performance. Findings The results suggest supplier list disclosure undermines firms' operational performance but enhances their innovation performance. The negative operational effect is amplified by higher supplier concentration and greater buyer competition, as these conditions increase the criticality and vulnerability of disclosed relational assets. The positive innovation effect is amplified by stronger media coverage and better CSR performance, which improve the visibility and credibility of the disclosure signal. These results are robust across alternative measures, model specifications, and identification strategies. Originality/value Our findings reconcile the longstanding tension between the documented benefits and costs of supply chain transparency by revealing the divergent performance consequences of supplier list disclosure. This study further contributes to the supply chain transparency and buyer-supplier governance literature by identifying key boundary conditions, thereby offering actionable guidance for designing optimal supplier list disclosure strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Operations & Production Management
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-01-2026-0033
Primary Topic
Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Eroding operations while elevating innovation: a dual-mechanism model of supplier list disclosure

Guikun Cao, Qiyuan Zhang, Kedi Wang, Andy C.L. Yeung
International Journal of Operations & Production Management
Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
article

Eroding operations while elevating innovation: a dual-mechanism model of supplier list disclosure

Guikun Cao, Qiyuan Zhang, Kedi Wang, Andy C.L. Yeung
article en

Abstract

Purpose Supplier list disclosure has become a defining feature of contemporary supply chain transparency, yet leading firms exhibit strikingly divergent disclosure choices and the empirical literature reports both benefits and costs. Drawing on the relational view and signaling theory, we develop and test a dual-mechanism framework explaining how proactive supplier list disclosure simultaneously erodes operational performance while enhancing innovation performance, and identify the conditions that amplify each effect. Design/methodology/approach Using panel data from Chinese listed firms from 2012 to 2024, we empirically test the relationships between supplier list disclosure and firms' operational and innovation performance. To validate the relational mechanism underlying disclosure's impact on operational performance, we test the moderating roles of supplier concentration and buyer competition. To validate the signaling mechanism underlying disclosure's impact on innovation performance, we test the moderating roles of media coverage and CSR performance. Findings The results suggest supplier list disclosure undermines firms' operational performance but enhances their innovation performance. The negative operational effect is amplified by higher supplier concentration and greater buyer competition, as these conditions increase the criticality and vulnerability of disclosed relational assets. The positive innovation effect is amplified by stronger media coverage and better CSR performance, which improve the visibility and credibility of the disclosure signal. These results are robust across alternative measures, model specifications, and identification strategies. Originality/value Our findings reconcile the longstanding tension between the documented benefits and costs of supply chain transparency by revealing the divergent performance consequences of supplier list disclosure. This study further contributes to the supply chain transparency and buyer-supplier governance literature by identifying key boundary conditions, thereby offering actionable guidance for designing optimal supplier list disclosure strategies.

International Journal of Operations & Production Management
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), South China Normal University (CN), South China University of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Guangdong Office of Philosophy and Social Science, Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.