Geometric–Chemical Distance between Protein Surfaces

Abstract Proteins recognize, bind, and catalyze through molecular surfaces, where geometry and chemical patterning determine interaction. Comparing these surfaces requires both a geometric–chemical distance and a correspondence that relates one complete surface to another. Here, we introduce IFACE (Intrinsic Field–Aligned Coupled Embedding). IFACE derives a symmetric geometric–chemical distance by optimizing a probabilistic coupling over intrinsic geometry, mean curvature, electrostatics, hydrophobicity, and hydrogen-bond propensity. The same coupling provides an explicit surface map. For molecular-dynamics conformers, IFACE distinguishes the same protein from distinct proteins more accurately than TM-distance and a Laplace–Beltrami spectral distance. A Jensen–Shannon distribution distance performs best in this binary identity test because aggregate surface-feature distributions already identify each protein. A distance must also satisfy a global requirement: Its pairwise values must place many distinct protein surfaces consistently in one space. We therefore tested IFACE across six protein families. It produces the strongest family classification and clustering among the distributional, spectral, MaSIF, and SurfaceID comparisons. The inferred maps preserve geodesic neighborhoods and transfer heme-centered pocket regions across cytochrome P450 proteins. IFACE therefore provides, from one construction, both a distance between complete protein surfaces and the local map that explains that distance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.6c02785
Primary Topic
Protein Structure and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Geometric–Chemical Distance between Protein Surfaces

Tsvi Tlusty, Jean‐Pierre Eckmann, Himanshu Swami, John M. McBride
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Protein Structure and Dynamics
article

Geometric–Chemical Distance between Protein Surfaces

Tsvi Tlusty, Jean‐Pierre Eckmann, Himanshu Swami, John M. McBride
article en

Abstract

Abstract Proteins recognize, bind, and catalyze through molecular surfaces, where geometry and chemical patterning determine interaction. Comparing these surfaces requires both a geometric–chemical distance and a correspondence that relates one complete surface to another. Here, we introduce IFACE (Intrinsic Field–Aligned Coupled Embedding). IFACE derives a symmetric geometric–chemical distance by optimizing a probabilistic coupling over intrinsic geometry, mean curvature, electrostatics, hydrophobicity, and hydrogen-bond propensity. The same coupling provides an explicit surface map. For molecular-dynamics conformers, IFACE distinguishes the same protein from distinct proteins more accurately than TM-distance and a Laplace–Beltrami spectral distance. A Jensen–Shannon distribution distance performs best in this binary identity test because aggregate surface-feature distributions already identify each protein. A distance must also satisfy a global requirement: Its pairwise values must place many distinct protein surfaces consistently in one space. We therefore tested IFACE across six protein families. It produces the strongest family classification and clustering among the distributional, spectral, MaSIF, and SurfaceID comparisons. The inferred maps preserve geodesic neighborhoods and transfer heme-centered pocket regions across cytochrome P450 proteins. IFACE therefore provides, from one construction, both a distance between complete protein surfaces and the local map that explains that distance.

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
University of Geneva (CH), Dominion (United States) (US), Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
National Centres of Competence in Research SwissMAP, National Research Foundation of Korea, Office of Naval Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Protein Structure and Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.