Multidimensional welfare profiling of broiler leg health under probiotic or antimicrobial growth-promoter supplementation and environmental enrichment
Abstract Broiler leg health is a complex and multidimensional welfare concern that may be inadequately characterized using isolated indicators. This study developed an individual-level multidimensional welfare-response profiling framework to evaluate broilers subjected to 3 dietary strategies—negative control, zinc bacitracin as an antimicrobial growth promoter (AGP), or a multi-strain probiotic—combined with environmental enrichment in a 3 × 2 factorial experiment involving 1,440 male broilers housed in 48 pens. Welfare outcomes were organized into 5 biological domains: locomotor performance, skeletal mineralization, postural deformity, cartilage and joint disorders, and spinal and muscular disorders. Outcomes were directionally harmonized and normalized to a 0–1 scale, with greater values consistently representing a more favorable welfare response, before aggregation into domain-specific scores and a global welfare-response index. Mixed-effects models included dietary additive, environmental enrichment, and their interaction as fixed effects and pen as a random effect to account for clustering within the experimental unit. The global welfare-response index ranged from 0.727 ± 0.022 for the control with enrichment to 0.759 ± 0.013 for the control without enrichment. No significant effects of dietary additive (P = 0.599), environmental enrichment (P = 0.207), or their interaction (P = 0.715) were detected for the global index. At the domain level, probiotic supplementation with enrichment produced the greatest numerical skeletal-mineralization score (0.631 ± 0.026), but neither dietary additive (P = 0.150), enrichment (P = 0.933), nor their interaction (P = 0.758) significantly affected this domain. The additive × enrichment interaction for postural deformity showed a tendency (P = 0.073), whereas no significant effects were detected for the locomotor, cartilage/joint, or spinal/muscular domains (P > 0.05). Sensitivity analyses using alternative domain-weighting scenarios showed that treatment rankings varied with welfare priorities, reinforcing that the composite index should be interpreted together with domain-specific outcomes. Overall, probiotic-supplemented groups showed global leg-health welfare profiles within the range observed for the zinc-bacitracin groups, while treatment responses were primarily domain-specific rather than consistently expressed across the integrated welfare profile.
Authors
- Agnês Markiy Odakura (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0413-5610)
- Caio César dos Ouros (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9801-6876)
- Jaqueline Murback Braz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3908-3686)
- Maria Fernanda de Castro Burbarelli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8079-2890)
- Fabiana Ribeiro Caldara (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7564-6127)
- Cláudia Marie Komiyama (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8732-5745)
- Rodrigo Garófallo Garcia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4978-9386)
- Irenilza de Alencar Nääs (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0663-9377)
- Elivelton de Salles da Silveira (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8482-1003)
- Lorraine Aline Barbosa de Lima (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6701-8251)
- Maria Eliza Ribeiro da Silva (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1299-0469)
- Letícia Cuer Garcia
Institutions
- Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados (BR)
- Universidade Paulista (BR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Animal Science
- Published
- 2026-09-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag293
- Primary Topic
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00