Innovative entrepreneurial entry over the business cycle: variation by form of innovation and country economic development

Abstract While prior studies indicate innovation and product introductions decrease during economic downturns and recessions, the nature of innovative entry by startups is unclear. Furthermore, studies of business entry, which is dominated by non-innovative firms, show mixed results. We build on innovation theories to propose that likelihood of entry varies with business cycle fluctuations, following an inverted U-shape relationship with startup innovativeness and with related contextual variations by level of economic development. Using GEM data to study entrepreneurial entry in 66 countries between 2003 and 2018—evaluating both the recovery from the dot.com crash and Global Financial Crisis—we find evidence supporting our proposed counter-cyclic disruption mechanism for discontinuously innovative entry, pro-cyclic prosperity pull mechanism for incrementally innovative entry, and counter-cyclic recession push mechanism for imitative entry, together with contextual variations with economic development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Small Business Economics
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-026-01270-z
Primary Topic
Firm Innovation and Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Innovative entrepreneurial entry over the business cycle: variation by form of innovation and country economic development

Paul Steffens, Kim Klyver
Small Business Economics
Firm Innovation and Growth
article

Innovative entrepreneurial entry over the business cycle: variation by form of innovation and country economic development

Paul Steffens, Kim Klyver
article en

Abstract

Abstract While prior studies indicate innovation and product introductions decrease during economic downturns and recessions, the nature of innovative entry by startups is unclear. Furthermore, studies of business entry, which is dominated by non-innovative firms, show mixed results. We build on innovation theories to propose that likelihood of entry varies with business cycle fluctuations, following an inverted U-shape relationship with startup innovativeness and with related contextual variations by level of economic development. Using GEM data to study entrepreneurial entry in 66 countries between 2003 and 2018—evaluating both the recovery from the dot.com crash and Global Financial Crisis—we find evidence supporting our proposed counter-cyclic disruption mechanism for discontinuously innovative entry, pro-cyclic prosperity pull mechanism for incrementally innovative entry, and counter-cyclic recession push mechanism for imitative entry, together with contextual variations with economic development.

Small Business Economics
University of Southern Denmark (DK), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Firm Innovation and Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.