Money talk: Compensation practices and experiences of Library and Information Science professionals in Indonesia

Most job advertisements in Indonesia exclude compensation information, except for government roles with fixed pay scales. Limited visibility creates uncertainty about fair pay outside government employment, especially within the niche profession of library and information science (LIS). This exploratory study examines compensation patterns and experiences of compensation practices among LIS professionals working in non-government sectors in Indonesia. An anonymous online survey gathered data through multiple choice items on salary and benefits, alongside open-ended questions on lived experiences. Responses were provided by 205 LIS professionals employed in non-government sectors across Indonesia. The findings informed a proposed Compensation Experience Framework for LIS Professionals, integrating reported compensation patterns with seven interrelated themes describing compensation practices and employment conditions. These themes include experiencing inequitable compensation conditions, restricted compensation negotiations, low professional standing, unclear career pathways and role boundaries, low job satisfaction, contemplating leaving, and advocating the LIS profession. Beyond advancing theoretical understanding, dissemination of these findings supports evidence-based professional discourse and practice. The study provides an evidence base for advocacy on compensation conditions among LIS professionals in Indonesia, grounded in reported lived experiences and supporting informed sector level discussion relevant to workforce sustainability and equity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006261476346
Primary Topic
Library Science and Information Literacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Money talk: Compensation practices and experiences of Library and Information Science professionals in Indonesia

Bekti Mulatiningsih
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
Library Science and Information Literacy
article

Money talk: Compensation practices and experiences of Library and Information Science professionals in Indonesia

Bekti Mulatiningsih
article en

Abstract

Most job advertisements in Indonesia exclude compensation information, except for government roles with fixed pay scales. Limited visibility creates uncertainty about fair pay outside government employment, especially within the niche profession of library and information science (LIS). This exploratory study examines compensation patterns and experiences of compensation practices among LIS professionals working in non-government sectors in Indonesia. An anonymous online survey gathered data through multiple choice items on salary and benefits, alongside open-ended questions on lived experiences. Responses were provided by 205 LIS professionals employed in non-government sectors across Indonesia. The findings informed a proposed Compensation Experience Framework for LIS Professionals, integrating reported compensation patterns with seven interrelated themes describing compensation practices and employment conditions. These themes include experiencing inequitable compensation conditions, restricted compensation negotiations, low professional standing, unclear career pathways and role boundaries, low job satisfaction, contemplating leaving, and advocating the LIS profession. Beyond advancing theoretical understanding, dissemination of these findings supports evidence-based professional discourse and practice. The study provides an evidence base for advocacy on compensation conditions among LIS professionals in Indonesia, grounded in reported lived experiences and supporting informed sector level discussion relevant to workforce sustainability and equity.

Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
The University of Queensland (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Library Science and Information Literacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Money talk: Compensation practices and experiences of Library and Information Science professionals in Indonesia — Bekti Mulatiningsih · Journal of Librarianship and Information Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS