Self-perceptions of medical students and educators regarding LGBTQ+ and sexual and gender minority (SGM) healthcare and SGM patients: cross-sectional survey

Abstract Context Providing adequate clinical training to care for patients of all demographics remains an important goal of medical education. Sexual and gender minority (SGM) patients are a population with consistently unmet clinical needs. Objectives The objective of this study is to assess baseline knowledge of SGM topics and perception toward treating SGM patients at a large osteopathic medical school. Methods A cross-sectional survey of faculty and osteopathic medical students at a large osteopathic medical school in the Northeast was administered. The survey contained 41 items regarding the comfort, knowledge, and preparedness to treat SGM patients. Data were collected from June 2021 to December 2021. The conventional cutoff to accept the null hypothesis was set at a p value of 0.05 for statistical hypothesis testing. Results The response rate was 24.3 %. Medical student respondents achieved higher knowledge scores than faculty respondents (p = 0.04), and younger respondents achieved higher knowledge scores than older respondents (p = 0.013). Heterosexual respondents reported lower aggregate comfort (p = 0.002) in treating SGM patients, whereas nonheterosexual respondents reported higher aggregate comfort in treatment of SGM patients. Clinical faculty perceived the medical curriculum to be less inclusive in addressing SGM topics in clinical medicine than nonclinical faculty (p = 0.001*), who overall felt that the medical curriculum was inclusive. Conclusions Among those surveyed, there were discrepancies in comfort treating SGM patients between heterosexual and nonheterosexual respondents, and younger respondents had increased knowledge on SGM health topics than older respondents. This research supports that osteopathic medical schools consider adopting the SGM medical education competencies published by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2025-0259
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-perceptions of medical students and educators regarding LGBTQ+ and sexual and gender minority (SGM) healthcare and SGM patients: cross-sectional survey

Megan Maguire, Min-Kyung Jung, Donna McMahon, Allison Walker et al.
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Self-perceptions of medical students and educators regarding LGBTQ+ and sexual and gender minority (SGM) healthcare and SGM patients: cross-sectional survey

Megan Maguire, Min-Kyung Jung, Donna McMahon, Allison Walker, Christine Hutak, Luis Alvarado, Sarah J. Muder, Karan Malik
article en

Abstract

Abstract Context Providing adequate clinical training to care for patients of all demographics remains an important goal of medical education. Sexual and gender minority (SGM) patients are a population with consistently unmet clinical needs. Objectives The objective of this study is to assess baseline knowledge of SGM topics and perception toward treating SGM patients at a large osteopathic medical school. Methods A cross-sectional survey of faculty and osteopathic medical students at a large osteopathic medical school in the Northeast was administered. The survey contained 41 items regarding the comfort, knowledge, and preparedness to treat SGM patients. Data were collected from June 2021 to December 2021. The conventional cutoff to accept the null hypothesis was set at a p value of 0.05 for statistical hypothesis testing. Results The response rate was 24.3 %. Medical student respondents achieved higher knowledge scores than faculty respondents (p = 0.04), and younger respondents achieved higher knowledge scores than older respondents (p = 0.013). Heterosexual respondents reported lower aggregate comfort (p = 0.002) in treating SGM patients, whereas nonheterosexual respondents reported higher aggregate comfort in treatment of SGM patients. Clinical faculty perceived the medical curriculum to be less inclusive in addressing SGM topics in clinical medicine than nonclinical faculty (p = 0.001*), who overall felt that the medical curriculum was inclusive. Conclusions Among those surveyed, there were discrepancies in comfort treating SGM patients between heterosexual and nonheterosexual respondents, and younger respondents had increased knowledge on SGM health topics than older respondents. This research supports that osteopathic medical schools consider adopting the SGM medical education competencies published by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC).

Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Tulane University (US), St. Luke's University Health Network (US), Long Island Jewish Medical Center (US), New York Institute of Technology (US)
Quality Education, Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.