CLIMATE DIPLOMACY ON X: HOW GLOBAL NORTH AND GLOBAL SOUTH STATES USED X AS A PUBLIC DIPLOMACY PLATFORM DURING THE AFRICA CLIMATE SUMMIT AND COP28 -A CASE OF KENYA AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

As the world of diplomacy becomes more platformized, states' foreign-policy agendas are communicated differently to international audiences. Research, however, on digital diplomacy typically views social media as a means of communication, and not as a medium where states craft a strategic narrative, shape international problems, and conduct diplomacy in front of networked audiences. This study explores the use of X as a public diplomacy platform by Kenya and the United States in the 2023 Africa Climate Summit (ACS) and COP28. The study looks at the ways states deployed X to build strategic narratives, shape climate politics, articulate a diplomatic stance, record diplomatic activity, and to establish national and regional identity, drawing on a comparative thematic analysis of 284 official posts across four sub-corpora: Kenya ACS, United States ACS, the Kenya COP28, and the United States COP28. The theories of Strategic Narrative, Media Diplomacy and Framing were used to guide the analysis. Findings illustrate different yet interwoven forms of public diplomacy based on X. In Kenya, X became a tool for African leadership building, a development for solutions, an advocacy tool for climate finance and a documentation tool for diplomacy. The United States applied X to the ACS and more intensely to COP28, focusing on the urgency of climate, domestic policy delivery, technological action and US leadership. The analysis also reveals a clear transition in ACS-COP28 communication in Kenya from a normative rhetoric on reform and leadership from Africa to investment and implementation. As the comparison shows, X does not obviate the distinction between Global North and Global South diplomacy. Instead, states have their own micro-narratives that they use to convey strategically differentiated messages based on their diplomatic stances, identities, and goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22727848
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

CLIMATE DIPLOMACY ON X: HOW GLOBAL NORTH AND GLOBAL SOUTH STATES USED X AS A PUBLIC DIPLOMACY PLATFORM DURING THE AFRICA CLIMATE SUMMIT AND COP28 -A CASE OF KENYA AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

Judy Wamuya1, Prof. Kyalo Wa Ngula2,, Dr. Augustus Nyakundi3
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

CLIMATE DIPLOMACY ON X: HOW GLOBAL NORTH AND GLOBAL SOUTH STATES USED X AS A PUBLIC DIPLOMACY PLATFORM DURING THE AFRICA CLIMATE SUMMIT AND COP28 -A CASE OF KENYA AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

Judy Wamuya1, Prof. Kyalo Wa Ngula2,, Dr. Augustus Nyakundi3
article en

Abstract

As the world of diplomacy becomes more platformized, states' foreign-policy agendas are communicated differently to international audiences. Research, however, on digital diplomacy typically views social media as a means of communication, and not as a medium where states craft a strategic narrative, shape international problems, and conduct diplomacy in front of networked audiences. This study explores the use of X as a public diplomacy platform by Kenya and the United States in the 2023 Africa Climate Summit (ACS) and COP28. The study looks at the ways states deployed X to build strategic narratives, shape climate politics, articulate a diplomatic stance, record diplomatic activity, and to establish national and regional identity, drawing on a comparative thematic analysis of 284 official posts across four sub-corpora: Kenya ACS, United States ACS, the Kenya COP28, and the United States COP28. The theories of Strategic Narrative, Media Diplomacy and Framing were used to guide the analysis. Findings illustrate different yet interwoven forms of public diplomacy based on X. In Kenya, X became a tool for African leadership building, a development for solutions, an advocacy tool for climate finance and a documentation tool for diplomacy. The United States applied X to the ACS and more intensely to COP28, focusing on the urgency of climate, domestic policy delivery, technological action and US leadership. The analysis also reveals a clear transition in ACS-COP28 communication in Kenya from a normative rhetoric on reform and leadership from Africa to investment and implementation. As the comparison shows, X does not obviate the distinction between Global North and Global South diplomacy. Instead, states have their own micro-narratives that they use to convey strategically differentiated messages based on their diplomatic stances, identities, and goals.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Chuka University (KE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.