Exploring the experiences of healthcare professionals carrying out the autism assessment/diagnostic process with adults – a qualitative study

Purpose Getting an autism diagnosis as an adult can be a complex and challenging process which can often include more complexities and considerations in comparison with assessments for children. This purpose of this study is to explore the experiences of professionals who assess adults for autism, to understand what makes the process complex and how it could be improved. Design/methodology/approach Eight semi-structured interviews were carried out with professionals experienced in assessing adults for autism. Interviews were recorded and transcripts were analysed thematically. Findings Three themes emerged from the data: 1. Difficulties unique to assessing adults, 2. The impact of clinical experience and 3. Suggestions for improving the assessment process for adults. The results of this study emphasise the need for development/modification of adult-appropriate tools which are designed specifically for adults as well as consideration of other limitations (such as difficulties obtaining developmental histories). Before this can be done, we need a clear consensus on the understanding of the heterogenous presentation of autism, as agreed by both professionals and autistic people. With a greater demand for assessments, there is a danger that the assessment process will be compromised. To avoid this, professionals require adequate training and support, and diagnostic tools should be used as part of a holistic assessment rather than the sole diagnostic determinant. Originality/value While most previous research focused on professional’s experiences assessing children (e.g. Jacobs et al., 2018) or combined experiences of assessing/diagnosing both children and adults (Crane et al., 2018; Rogers et al., 2016), research has yet to explore professional experiences unique to the process of assessing/diagnosing autistic adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Autism
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/aia-05-2026-0071
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Exploring the experiences of healthcare professionals carrying out the autism assessment/diagnostic process with adults – a qualitative study

Kirsten Barnicot, Jacqueline Sin, Sophie Jones
Advances in Autism
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
article

Exploring the experiences of healthcare professionals carrying out the autism assessment/diagnostic process with adults – a qualitative study

Kirsten Barnicot, Jacqueline Sin, Sophie Jones
article en

Abstract

Purpose Getting an autism diagnosis as an adult can be a complex and challenging process which can often include more complexities and considerations in comparison with assessments for children. This purpose of this study is to explore the experiences of professionals who assess adults for autism, to understand what makes the process complex and how it could be improved. Design/methodology/approach Eight semi-structured interviews were carried out with professionals experienced in assessing adults for autism. Interviews were recorded and transcripts were analysed thematically. Findings Three themes emerged from the data: 1. Difficulties unique to assessing adults, 2. The impact of clinical experience and 3. Suggestions for improving the assessment process for adults. The results of this study emphasise the need for development/modification of adult-appropriate tools which are designed specifically for adults as well as consideration of other limitations (such as difficulties obtaining developmental histories). Before this can be done, we need a clear consensus on the understanding of the heterogenous presentation of autism, as agreed by both professionals and autistic people. With a greater demand for assessments, there is a danger that the assessment process will be compromised. To avoid this, professionals require adequate training and support, and diagnostic tools should be used as part of a holistic assessment rather than the sole diagnostic determinant. Originality/value While most previous research focused on professional’s experiences assessing children (e.g. Jacobs et al., 2018) or combined experiences of assessing/diagnosing both children and adults (Crane et al., 2018; Rogers et al., 2016), research has yet to explore professional experiences unique to the process of assessing/diagnosing autistic adults.

Advances in Autism
St George's, University of London (GB), City, University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.