Effects of positive and negative peer modelling versus neutral social interaction before spinal manipulative therapy in adults with chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol for a three-arm randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Responses to spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) may be influenced by treatment expectations, which can be shaped through observational learning. OBJECTIVES: To compare current pain intensity 60 min after lumbar SMT among positive peer-modeling, neutral social-interaction, and negative peer-modeling conditions in individuals with CNSLBP. METHODS/DESIGN: This single-center, three-arm randomized controlled trial will allocate participants in a 1:1:1 ratio to positive peer modeling, neutral social interaction, or negative peer modeling before receiving the standardized lumbar high-velocity low-amplitude SMT. Assessments will occur at baseline (T0a), immediately after the simulated-patient interaction and before SMT (T0b), 60 min after SMT (T1), and 24 h after SMT (T2). The primary outcome and time point will be current pain intensity measured with the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS-11) at T1. Secondary outcomes will include pain at T2, stress, kinesiophobia, disability, pressure pain threshold, tissue temperature, lumbar range of motion, expectation fulfillment, and treatment satisfaction. Empathy and inflammatory biomarkers will be evaluated as exploratory outcomes. DISCUSSION: The trial will analyze whether the three simulated-patient conditions produce different short-term responses to identical SMT, without determining the effect of simulated-patient exposure compared with no exposure. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT07507604.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pain Management
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2026.2731962
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of positive and negative peer modelling versus neutral social interaction before spinal manipulative therapy in adults with chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol for a three-arm randomized controlled trial

Luana Colloca, Kamil Zaworski, Joanna Baj-KorpaK, Anna Kręgiel-Rosiak et al.
Pain Management
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Effects of positive and negative peer modelling versus neutral social interaction before spinal manipulative therapy in adults with chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol for a three-arm randomized controlled trial

Luana Colloca, Kamil Zaworski, Joanna Baj-KorpaK, Anna Kręgiel-Rosiak, Ewa Plażuk, Dave Newell, Andżelika Nazarewicz, Chad Cook, Giacomo Rossettini
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Responses to spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) may be influenced by treatment expectations, which can be shaped through observational learning. OBJECTIVES: To compare current pain intensity 60 min after lumbar SMT among positive peer-modeling, neutral social-interaction, and negative peer-modeling conditions in individuals with CNSLBP. METHODS/DESIGN: This single-center, three-arm randomized controlled trial will allocate participants in a 1:1:1 ratio to positive peer modeling, neutral social interaction, or negative peer modeling before receiving the standardized lumbar high-velocity low-amplitude SMT. Assessments will occur at baseline (T0a), immediately after the simulated-patient interaction and before SMT (T0b), 60 min after SMT (T1), and 24 h after SMT (T2). The primary outcome and time point will be current pain intensity measured with the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS-11) at T1. Secondary outcomes will include pain at T2, stress, kinesiophobia, disability, pressure pain threshold, tissue temperature, lumbar range of motion, expectation fulfillment, and treatment satisfaction. Empathy and inflammatory biomarkers will be evaluated as exploratory outcomes. DISCUSSION: The trial will analyze whether the three simulated-patient conditions produce different short-term responses to identical SMT, without determining the effect of simulated-patient exposure compared with no exposure. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT07507604.

Pain Management
University of Verona (IT), Duke University (US), Universidad Europea (MX), John Paul II Hospital (PL), Universidad CES (CO), University of Southampton (GB), University of Maryland, College Park (US), Universidad Europea de Madrid (ES)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.