Calibration of GEDI L4A AGBD products in boreal and tropical forests of China

Accurate forest aboveground biomass estimation is essential for carbon accounting and ecosystem monitoring. NASA’s Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) provides a unique opportunity for large-scale estimation of aboveground biomass density (AGBD). However, the GEDI L4A products exhibit considerable uncertainty in China due to limited local training samples, and regional validation and calibration remain scarce. This study validates and calibrates L4A estimates using AGBD derived from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) observations and airborne laser scanning (ALS) data across two representative forest ecosystems, including the boreal forests of Daxing′anling in northeastern China and the tropical rainforests of Jianfengling in southern China. Results show that L4A AGBD is overestimated in Daxing′anling, with a bias of 22.33 Mg/ha, and underestimated in Jianfengling, with a bias of −87.62 Mg/ha. Intercept-based calibration reduces the root-mean-square error (RMSE) from 34.71 to 25.48 Mg/ha in Daxing′anling and from 96.54 to 38.01 Mg/ha in Jianfengling, while the calibration based on both intercept and slope yields slightly better performance, reducing RMSE further to 24.43 and 33.62 Mg/ha, respectively. These findings underscore the necessity of GEDI L4A model calibration and suggest that intercept-only calibration can effectively improve the accuracy of L4A products in some data-scarce regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing Letters
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2150704x.2026.2730239
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Calibration of GEDI L4A AGBD products in boreal and tropical forests of China

Jie Pan, Jinbiao Zhu, Tianyu Yu, Jianing Li et al.
Remote Sensing Letters
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
article

Calibration of GEDI L4A AGBD products in boreal and tropical forests of China

Jie Pan, Jinbiao Zhu, Tianyu Yu, Jianing Li, Liu Yuquan, Wenjian Ni, Zhiyu Zhang, Zhifeng Guo, Jie Wang
article en

Abstract

Accurate forest aboveground biomass estimation is essential for carbon accounting and ecosystem monitoring. NASA’s Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) provides a unique opportunity for large-scale estimation of aboveground biomass density (AGBD). However, the GEDI L4A products exhibit considerable uncertainty in China due to limited local training samples, and regional validation and calibration remain scarce. This study validates and calibrates L4A estimates using AGBD derived from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) observations and airborne laser scanning (ALS) data across two representative forest ecosystems, including the boreal forests of Daxing′anling in northeastern China and the tropical rainforests of Jianfengling in southern China. Results show that L4A AGBD is overestimated in Daxing′anling, with a bias of 22.33 Mg/ha, and underestimated in Jianfengling, with a bias of −87.62 Mg/ha. Intercept-based calibration reduces the root-mean-square error (RMSE) from 34.71 to 25.48 Mg/ha in Daxing′anling and from 96.54 to 38.01 Mg/ha in Jianfengling, while the calibration based on both intercept and slope yields slightly better performance, reducing RMSE further to 24.43 and 33.62 Mg/ha, respectively. These findings underscore the necessity of GEDI L4A model calibration and suggest that intercept-only calibration can effectively improve the accuracy of L4A products in some data-scarce regions.

Remote Sensing LettersVol. 17(12)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.