The Credibility Revolution Meets Research Design: Considerations for Antitrust Practitioners

Merging parties continue to advocate using cross-sectional regressions of price against Herfindahl–Hirschman Indices (HHIs) despite warnings regarding their inability to predict anticompetitive merger effects. Using the FTC vs. Kroger/Albertsons as a case study, we illustrate how regression design, in general, is important for generating reliable results. We show how demand and supply conditions can vary systematically across areas with different numbers of competitors such that cross-sectional comparisons of price and concentration confound multiple explanations, biasing results. We argue that different study designs control for changes in competitive conditions within local areas, but may be difficult to implement with available data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Antitrust Bulletin
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603x261484070
Primary Topic
Merger and Competition Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Credibility Revolution Meets Research Design: Considerations for Antitrust Practitioners

Emily Blackburn, Brett Wendling
The Antitrust Bulletin
Merger and Competition Analysis
article

The Credibility Revolution Meets Research Design: Considerations for Antitrust Practitioners

Emily Blackburn, Brett Wendling
article en

Abstract

Merging parties continue to advocate using cross-sectional regressions of price against Herfindahl–Hirschman Indices (HHIs) despite warnings regarding their inability to predict anticompetitive merger effects. Using the FTC vs. Kroger/Albertsons as a case study, we illustrate how regression design, in general, is important for generating reliable results. We show how demand and supply conditions can vary systematically across areas with different numbers of competitors such that cross-sectional comparisons of price and concentration confound multiple explanations, biasing results. We argue that different study designs control for changes in competitive conditions within local areas, but may be difficult to implement with available data.

The Antitrust Bulletin
King & Spalding (US), Federal Trade Commission (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Merger and Competition Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.