The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the comprehensive assessment of acceptance and commitment therapy processes in individuals with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES: The increasing application of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) in oncology suggests that psychological flexibility may be a crucial factor in the treatment of individuals with cancer, rehabilitation and well-being. The Chinese version of the Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Processes (CompACT-C) was found to have acceptable reliability and validity among individuals with breast cancer; however, its psychometric properties have not been verified among individuals with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: Convenience sampling was used to recruit participants diagnosed with NPC from a Grade III Level A hospital in Guangdong Province, China. The patients provided general demographic data and completed the CompACT-C and the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II). The construct validity of the CompACT-C was tested using confirmatory factor analysis based on its original three-factor structure, and its internal consistency and 2-week test-retest reliability were evaluated. Convergent validity was determined by analyzing the correlation between the CompACT-C and AAQ-II. RESULTS: < 0.001) in this sample of individuals with NPC. CONCLUSIONS: The CompACT-C demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity for assessing psychological flexibility in individuals with NPC, supporting its use as an assessment instrument in future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2026.2731453
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the comprehensive assessment of acceptance and commitment therapy processes in individuals with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A cross-sectional study

Li Liu, Lulu Li, Siyi Chen, Lanhua Ma et al.
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology
Cancer survivorship and care
article

The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the comprehensive assessment of acceptance and commitment therapy processes in individuals with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A cross-sectional study

Li Liu, Lulu Li, Siyi Chen, Lanhua Ma, Wenqian Zhao
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The increasing application of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) in oncology suggests that psychological flexibility may be a crucial factor in the treatment of individuals with cancer, rehabilitation and well-being. The Chinese version of the Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Processes (CompACT-C) was found to have acceptable reliability and validity among individuals with breast cancer; however, its psychometric properties have not been verified among individuals with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: Convenience sampling was used to recruit participants diagnosed with NPC from a Grade III Level A hospital in Guangdong Province, China. The patients provided general demographic data and completed the CompACT-C and the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II). The construct validity of the CompACT-C was tested using confirmatory factor analysis based on its original three-factor structure, and its internal consistency and 2-week test-retest reliability were evaluated. Convergent validity was determined by analyzing the correlation between the CompACT-C and AAQ-II. RESULTS: < 0.001) in this sample of individuals with NPC. CONCLUSIONS: The CompACT-C demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity for assessing psychological flexibility in individuals with NPC, supporting its use as an assessment instrument in future research.

Journal of Psychosocial Oncology
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.