Real-world effectiveness of myopia control spectacles and dual-focus contact lenses in the French myopia cohort

Our study aimed to compare the efficacy of Myopia Control Spectacles (MCS), including Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segment (DIMS) and Highly Aspherical Lenslets (HAL), and dual-focus contact lenses on myopia progression. This longitudinal, real-world study included myopic children aged 7 to 18 years wearing myopia control optical modalities for at least 12 months between 2020 and 2024, with a group using single-vision lenses included for reference. After matching for age, sex, and baseline refractive error, changes in cycloplegic spherical equivalent of the right eye were assessed at twelve, eighteen, and twenty-four months, including a subgroup of children who showed faster initial progression. The cohort included 425 children using dual-focus contact lenses, 307 using DIMS, 118 using HAL, and 850 using single-vision lenses. At twenty-four months, myopia control was not statistically different between the dual-focus contact lenses and myopia control spectacles group. For the subgroup of progressors, the myopia control groups of children showed median progression of − 0.25 to 0.00D. In this European real-world study on different myopia control optical modalities, both MCS and MCL showed no statistical differences in reduction in myopia progression (for 7 to 12 years old, \(\:{\epsilon\:}^{2}\) =0.01 [95%CI = 0 to 0.07]. These findings should be interpreted with caution, as the study relied on spherical equivalent calculated from optical refraction rather than axial length measurement, thereby restricting its ability to fully assess true myopia progression.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-71670-4
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world effectiveness of myopia control spectacles and dual-focus contact lenses in the French myopia cohort

Mathieu Naudin, Mark A. Bullimore, Nicolas Leveziel, Rime Najji et al.
Scientific Reports
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Real-world effectiveness of myopia control spectacles and dual-focus contact lenses in the French myopia cohort

Mathieu Naudin, Mark A. Bullimore, Nicolas Leveziel, Rime Najji, Alain Bron, Serge Resnikoff, Jost B. Jonas, Clément Giraud, Christine Fernandez-Maloigne, Rupert Bourne
article en

Abstract

Our study aimed to compare the efficacy of Myopia Control Spectacles (MCS), including Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segment (DIMS) and Highly Aspherical Lenslets (HAL), and dual-focus contact lenses on myopia progression. This longitudinal, real-world study included myopic children aged 7 to 18 years wearing myopia control optical modalities for at least 12 months between 2020 and 2024, with a group using single-vision lenses included for reference. After matching for age, sex, and baseline refractive error, changes in cycloplegic spherical equivalent of the right eye were assessed at twelve, eighteen, and twenty-four months, including a subgroup of children who showed faster initial progression. The cohort included 425 children using dual-focus contact lenses, 307 using DIMS, 118 using HAL, and 850 using single-vision lenses. At twenty-four months, myopia control was not statistically different between the dual-focus contact lenses and myopia control spectacles group. For the subgroup of progressors, the myopia control groups of children showed median progression of − 0.25 to 0.00D. In this European real-world study on different myopia control optical modalities, both MCS and MCL showed no statistical differences in reduction in myopia progression (for 7 to 12 years old, \(\:{\epsilon\:}^{2}\) =0.01 [95%CI = 0 to 0.07]. These findings should be interpreted with caution, as the study relied on spherical equivalent calculated from optical refraction rather than axial length measurement, thereby restricting its ability to fully assess true myopia progression.

Scientific Reports
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), Singapore National Eye Center (SG), UNSW Sydney (AU), Université de Poitiers (FR), XLIM (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers (FR), Singapore Eye Research Institute (SG), Fondation de Rothschild (FR), University of Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.