Does baseline strength influence adaptations to velocity loss threshold-based resistance training?

This study examined whether baseline strength moderates the magnitude of adaptations to velocity loss (VL) threshold-based resistance training across different training populations. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus (EBSCO), and Embase up to January 2026. Randomized controlled trials were included if they implemented resistance training prescribed using predefined VL thresholds, lasted at least 3 weeks, reported quantifiable baseline strength data, and provided pre- and post-intervention measures of strength and/or power outcomes. Effect sizes were calculated as standardized within-group pre-post changes (Hedges’ g ). A three-level random-effects meta-regression model was applied to account for statistical dependence among multiple effect sizes within studies. Baseline strength (standardized 1RM) was examined as the primary moderator, with training status and VL threshold entered as additional moderators. Sixteen studies providing 89 effect sizes were included. VL threshold-based resistance training produced a moderate overall within-group improvement in strength and power outcomes ( g = 0.59, 95% CI [0.40, 0.77], p < 0.001). The omnibus test of moderators was not statistically significant (QM(4) = 1.09, p = 0.896). Baseline strength was not significantly associated with adaptation magnitude ( β = -0.076, p = 0.355), and the interaction between baseline strength and training status was also not statistically significant ( β = 0.045, p = 0.775). VL threshold-based resistance training elicits moderate improvements in neuromuscular performance. Within the limitations of the available evidence, no statistically detectable moderation by baseline strength or categorical training status was observed. These findings suggest that current evidence does not clearly support modifying VL prescriptions solely on the basis of baseline strength; however, equivalence across populations cannot be definitively established.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-026-02067-z
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Does baseline strength influence adaptations to velocity loss threshold-based resistance training?

Kelin Huo, Tianyuan He, Lin Xie, Jiaxin He et al.
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
Sports Performance and Training
article

Does baseline strength influence adaptations to velocity loss threshold-based resistance training?

Kelin Huo, Tianyuan He, Lin Xie, Jiaxin He, Junjie Tao, Xinjun Chen
article en

Abstract

This study examined whether baseline strength moderates the magnitude of adaptations to velocity loss (VL) threshold-based resistance training across different training populations. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus (EBSCO), and Embase up to January 2026. Randomized controlled trials were included if they implemented resistance training prescribed using predefined VL thresholds, lasted at least 3 weeks, reported quantifiable baseline strength data, and provided pre- and post-intervention measures of strength and/or power outcomes. Effect sizes were calculated as standardized within-group pre-post changes (Hedges’ g ). A three-level random-effects meta-regression model was applied to account for statistical dependence among multiple effect sizes within studies. Baseline strength (standardized 1RM) was examined as the primary moderator, with training status and VL threshold entered as additional moderators. Sixteen studies providing 89 effect sizes were included. VL threshold-based resistance training produced a moderate overall within-group improvement in strength and power outcomes ( g = 0.59, 95% CI [0.40, 0.77], p < 0.001). The omnibus test of moderators was not statistically significant (QM(4) = 1.09, p = 0.896). Baseline strength was not significantly associated with adaptation magnitude ( β = -0.076, p = 0.355), and the interaction between baseline strength and training status was also not statistically significant ( β = 0.045, p = 0.775). VL threshold-based resistance training elicits moderate improvements in neuromuscular performance. Within the limitations of the available evidence, no statistically detectable moderation by baseline strength or categorical training status was observed. These findings suggest that current evidence does not clearly support modifying VL prescriptions solely on the basis of baseline strength; however, equivalence across populations cannot be definitively established.

BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
Guangzhou Sport University (CN), Macao Polytechnic University (MO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.