Induction-to-delivery time and neonatal resuscitation after cesarean delivery under general anesthesia: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

General anesthesia (GA) remains an important option for cesarean delivery when neuraxial anesthesia is contraindicated or otherwise unsuitable, but it has been associated with less favorable neonatal outcomes. Among potential contributors, induction-to-delivery (ID) time—defined as the interval from the administration of general anesthetic agents to delivery of the neonate—may represent a clinically relevant perioperative factor. This study aimed to assess the relationship between ID time and the need for neonatal resuscitation during GA cesarean delivery, and to identify perioperative and maternal factors associated with increased resuscitation risk. A multicenter retrospective study was conducted among women with singleton pregnancies who underwent planned cesarean delivery under GA. Baseline maternal, anesthetic, and neonatal variables were collected. Categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-square test, and continuous variables using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors independently associated with neonatal resuscitation, and a restricted cubic spline (RCS) model was used to evaluate the relationship between ID time and the probability of resuscitation. A total of 1,523 cases were included; 212 neonates (13.9%) required resuscitation. Prolonged ID time was independently associated with an increased likelihood of neonatal resuscitation (OR = 1.04 per minute; 95% CI 1.01–1.06, p = 0.003). Additional factors associated with neonatal resuscitation included gestational age < 34 weeks (OR = 17.11, 95% CI 10.49–28.17), gestational age 34–37 weeks (OR = 3.59, 95% CI 2.47–5.26), American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status III–IV (OR = 1.82, 95% CI 1.13–2.88), and anesthetic regimens involving propofol + sevoflurane (OR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.09–3.34) or other regimens (OR = 8.86, 95% CI 4.55–17.45) compared with propofol + remifentanil. The estimate for the small, heterogeneous ‘other regimens’ category should be interpreted cautiously. Exploratory RCS analysis showed an increasing probability of neonatal resuscitation with longer ID time. Longer ID time under GA was associated with a higher likelihood of neonatal resuscitation. ID time may serve as a clinically relevant perioperative marker in cesarean delivery under GA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Anesthesiology
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-026-04242-8
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Induction-to-delivery time and neonatal resuscitation after cesarean delivery under general anesthesia: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

Yuehan Gao, Chang Liu, Zhaoyang Zhong, Ma Yin et al.
BMC Anesthesiology
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Induction-to-delivery time and neonatal resuscitation after cesarean delivery under general anesthesia: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

Yuehan Gao, Chang Liu, Zhaoyang Zhong, Ma Yin, Liang Li, Ran Chu, Lifang Zhao
article en

Abstract

General anesthesia (GA) remains an important option for cesarean delivery when neuraxial anesthesia is contraindicated or otherwise unsuitable, but it has been associated with less favorable neonatal outcomes. Among potential contributors, induction-to-delivery (ID) time—defined as the interval from the administration of general anesthetic agents to delivery of the neonate—may represent a clinically relevant perioperative factor. This study aimed to assess the relationship between ID time and the need for neonatal resuscitation during GA cesarean delivery, and to identify perioperative and maternal factors associated with increased resuscitation risk. A multicenter retrospective study was conducted among women with singleton pregnancies who underwent planned cesarean delivery under GA. Baseline maternal, anesthetic, and neonatal variables were collected. Categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-square test, and continuous variables using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors independently associated with neonatal resuscitation, and a restricted cubic spline (RCS) model was used to evaluate the relationship between ID time and the probability of resuscitation. A total of 1,523 cases were included; 212 neonates (13.9%) required resuscitation. Prolonged ID time was independently associated with an increased likelihood of neonatal resuscitation (OR = 1.04 per minute; 95% CI 1.01–1.06, p = 0.003). Additional factors associated with neonatal resuscitation included gestational age < 34 weeks (OR = 17.11, 95% CI 10.49–28.17), gestational age 34–37 weeks (OR = 3.59, 95% CI 2.47–5.26), American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status III–IV (OR = 1.82, 95% CI 1.13–2.88), and anesthetic regimens involving propofol + sevoflurane (OR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.09–3.34) or other regimens (OR = 8.86, 95% CI 4.55–17.45) compared with propofol + remifentanil. The estimate for the small, heterogeneous ‘other regimens’ category should be interpreted cautiously. Exploratory RCS analysis showed an increasing probability of neonatal resuscitation with longer ID time. Longer ID time under GA was associated with a higher likelihood of neonatal resuscitation. ID time may serve as a clinically relevant perioperative marker in cesarean delivery under GA.

BMC Anesthesiology
Shandong University of Aeronautics (CN), Shandong University (CN), Shandong Provincial Hospital (CN), The First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang (CN), Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (CN), Shandong First Medical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.