Risk of hostility and aggression with perampanel monotherapy versus combination therapy in pediatric epilepsy: A Japanese post‐marketing database study using a nested case–control design

OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of hostility- and aggression-related adverse events in children with focal-onset seizures (FOS), with or without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS), receiving perampanel as monotherapy or in combination with other antiseizure medications (ASMs). METHODS: This analysis used a real-world Japanese database integrating claims data, electronic medical records, and Diagnosis Procedure Combination data, alongside study-specific physician-reported outcomes. Children aged 4-11 years treated with perampanel for FOS with or without FBTCS were included. Using a nested case-control design, analyses adjusted for baseline covariates were conducted to compare the incidence of hostility- and aggression-related adverse events in children treated with perampanel as monotherapy vs. combination therapy with other ASMs. RESULTS: Among 158 prospectively collected patients included in the primary analysis set, 10 (6.3%) experienced 14 hostility- and aggression-related adverse events, including irritability (n = 5), aggression (n = 5), anger (n = 2), anxiety (n = 1), and hallucinations (n = 1). There were no significant differences in the risk of hostility or aggression between patients receiving perampanel as monotherapy or in combination with other ASMs. Secondary and sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings. SIGNIFICANCE: The safety profile of perampanel in routine pediatric practice was consistent with prior clinical trial data. The potential for hostility- and aggression-related adverse events warrants caution, but rates did not differ between perampanel as monotherapy vs. in combination with other ASMs. This study also demonstrated the feasibility of integrating physician-reported outcomes into post-marketing surveillance using a real-world database, providing detailed insights beyond standard medical information.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epileptic Disorders
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/epd2.70399
Primary Topic
Epilepsy research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Risk of hostility and aggression with perampanel monotherapy versus combination therapy in pediatric epilepsy: A Japanese post‐marketing database study using a nested case–control design

Kazuhiro Matsutani, Kasumi Daidoji, Masato Takeuchi, Mika Ishii et al.
Epileptic Disorders
Epilepsy research and treatment
article

Risk of hostility and aggression with perampanel monotherapy versus combination therapy in pediatric epilepsy: A Japanese post‐marketing database study using a nested case–control design

Kazuhiro Matsutani, Kasumi Daidoji, Masato Takeuchi, Mika Ishii, Yukitoshi Takahashi, Akiko Yoshimura
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of hostility- and aggression-related adverse events in children with focal-onset seizures (FOS), with or without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS), receiving perampanel as monotherapy or in combination with other antiseizure medications (ASMs). METHODS: This analysis used a real-world Japanese database integrating claims data, electronic medical records, and Diagnosis Procedure Combination data, alongside study-specific physician-reported outcomes. Children aged 4-11 years treated with perampanel for FOS with or without FBTCS were included. Using a nested case-control design, analyses adjusted for baseline covariates were conducted to compare the incidence of hostility- and aggression-related adverse events in children treated with perampanel as monotherapy vs. combination therapy with other ASMs. RESULTS: Among 158 prospectively collected patients included in the primary analysis set, 10 (6.3%) experienced 14 hostility- and aggression-related adverse events, including irritability (n = 5), aggression (n = 5), anger (n = 2), anxiety (n = 1), and hallucinations (n = 1). There were no significant differences in the risk of hostility or aggression between patients receiving perampanel as monotherapy or in combination with other ASMs. Secondary and sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings. SIGNIFICANCE: The safety profile of perampanel in routine pediatric practice was consistent with prior clinical trial data. The potential for hostility- and aggression-related adverse events warrants caution, but rates did not differ between perampanel as monotherapy vs. in combination with other ASMs. This study also demonstrated the feasibility of integrating physician-reported outcomes into post-marketing surveillance using a real-world database, providing detailed insights beyond standard medical information.

Epileptic Disorders
National Epilepsy Center (JP), Eisai (Japan) (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Epilepsy research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.