Circular Economy Implementation: A Paradox–Dynamic Capabilities Perspective Under Institutional Pressures

ABSTRACT Why do firms facing similar sustainability pressures differ substantially in circular economy implementation? Existing research provides limited insight into how institutional pressures are internally interpreted and translated into organizational action. Drawing on institutional theory, paradox theory, and the dynamic capabilities perspective, this study develops and tests a multilevel model explaining how institutional pressures shape circular economy implementation through managerial cognition and organizational capabilities. Using survey data from 312 managers across European firms, the findings reveal that institutional pressures positively influence paradox mindset, dynamic capabilities, and circular economy implementation. However, paradox mindset does not directly translate into implementation; instead, its effect operates indirectly through dynamic capabilities. These findings suggest that institutional pressures alone do not explain variation in circular economy implementation across firms. The study advances a microfoundational and process‐oriented explanation of circular economy implementation and offers insights into how firms can strengthen the capabilities needed to translate sustainability pressures into operational change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71551
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Circular Economy Implementation: A Paradox–Dynamic Capabilities Perspective Under Institutional Pressures

Owais Khan, Samuli Patala
Business Strategy and the Environment
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
article

Circular Economy Implementation: A Paradox–Dynamic Capabilities Perspective Under Institutional Pressures

Owais Khan, Samuli Patala
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Why do firms facing similar sustainability pressures differ substantially in circular economy implementation? Existing research provides limited insight into how institutional pressures are internally interpreted and translated into organizational action. Drawing on institutional theory, paradox theory, and the dynamic capabilities perspective, this study develops and tests a multilevel model explaining how institutional pressures shape circular economy implementation through managerial cognition and organizational capabilities. Using survey data from 312 managers across European firms, the findings reveal that institutional pressures positively influence paradox mindset, dynamic capabilities, and circular economy implementation. However, paradox mindset does not directly translate into implementation; instead, its effect operates indirectly through dynamic capabilities. These findings suggest that institutional pressures alone do not explain variation in circular economy implementation across firms. The study advances a microfoundational and process‐oriented explanation of circular economy implementation and offers insights into how firms can strengthen the capabilities needed to translate sustainability pressures into operational change.

Business Strategy and the Environment
Aalto University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Circular Economy Implementation: A Paradox–Dynamic Capabilities Perspective Under Institutional Pressures — Owais Khan, Samuli Patala · Business Strategy and the Environment (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS