Agentic AI and the Dissolution of Managerial Authority: Organisational Sensegiving in Autonomous Decision-Making Systems

Agentic artificial intelligence (AI) is shifting from decision support to autonomous coordination, challenging established assumptions about managerial authority. This qualitative conceptual paper synthesises recent literature in algorithmic management, organisational theory, and human-computer interaction to examine how agentic AI reshapes organisational sensegiving. The analysis argues that autonomous decision-making systems function as an organising layer that reallocates decision rights, displaces managerial power, and creates agency loops in which accountability circulates between human and artificial actors. Findings highlight three consequences: erosion of middle-manager sensegiving, professional identity threat and ontological insecurity, and the need for an Agentic Operating Model that embeds meaningful human oversight, control layers, and governance accountability. The paper contributes a theoretically integrated account of agentic AI as an organisational actor and offers practical implications for maintaining human agency, ethical judgment, and organisational resilience in AI-orchestrated firms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22727804
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Agentic AI and the Dissolution of Managerial Authority: Organisational Sensegiving in Autonomous Decision-Making Systems

Kwan Hong TAN
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
preprint

Agentic AI and the Dissolution of Managerial Authority: Organisational Sensegiving in Autonomous Decision-Making Systems

Kwan Hong TAN
preprint en

Abstract

Agentic artificial intelligence (AI) is shifting from decision support to autonomous coordination, challenging established assumptions about managerial authority. This qualitative conceptual paper synthesises recent literature in algorithmic management, organisational theory, and human-computer interaction to examine how agentic AI reshapes organisational sensegiving. The analysis argues that autonomous decision-making systems function as an organising layer that reallocates decision rights, displaces managerial power, and creates agency loops in which accountability circulates between human and artificial actors. Findings highlight three consequences: erosion of middle-manager sensegiving, professional identity threat and ontological insecurity, and the need for an Agentic Operating Model that embeds meaningful human oversight, control layers, and governance accountability. The paper contributes a theoretically integrated account of agentic AI as an organisational actor and offers practical implications for maintaining human agency, ethical judgment, and organisational resilience in AI-orchestrated firms.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Suffolk (GB), University of West London (GB), University of Northampton (GB), Graham International Implant Institute (US), Singapore University of Social Sciences (SG)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.